These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23758595)

  • 21. Microleakage of IPS empress 2 inlay restorations luted with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Cal E; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):417-24. PubMed ID: 22360365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical evaluation of ceramic inlays and onlays fabricated with two systems: two-year clinical follow up.
    Coelho Santos MJ; Mondelli RF; Lauris JR; Navarro MF
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 15088722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: Laboratory study.
    Wafaie RA; Ibrahim Ali A; Mahmoud SH
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 May; 30(3):229-239. PubMed ID: 29368375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fatigue resistance and failure mode of adhesively restored custom implant zirconia abutments.
    Oderich E; Boff LL; Cardoso AC; Magne P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Dec; 23(12):1360-8. PubMed ID: 22117899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Luting of CAD/CAM ceramic inlays: direct composite versus dual-cure luting cement.
    Kameyama A; Bonroy K; Elsen C; Lührs AK; Suyama Y; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; De Munck J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2015; 25(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 26407114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of proximal box elevation on the marginal quality and fracture behavior of root-filled molars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic or composite onlays.
    Ilgenstein I; Zitzmann NU; Bühler J; Wegehaupt FJ; Attin T; Weiger R; Krastl G
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Jun; 19(5):1021-8. PubMed ID: 25248949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays luted with self-adhesive resin cement: a 2-year in vivo study.
    Taschner M; Krämer N; Lohbauer U; Pelka M; Breschi L; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 22236770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with CAD/CAM ceramic inlays.
    Hannig C; Westphal C; Becker K; Attin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 16198171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Restoration integrity, but not material or cementation strategy determined secondary caries lesions next to indirect restorations in vitro.
    Lehmensiek M; Askar H; Brouwer F; Blunck U; Paris S; Schwendicke F
    Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e317-e323. PubMed ID: 30269863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic.
    Sasse M; Krummel A; Klosa K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):907-15. PubMed ID: 26051232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with all-ceramic inlays and onlays: an in vitro study.
    Saridag S; Sevimay M; Pekkan G
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):626-34. PubMed ID: 23391033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Survival of resin infiltrated ceramics under influence of fatigue.
    Aboushelib MN; Elsafi MH
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):529-34. PubMed ID: 26764178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A 10-year prospective evaluation of CAD/CAM-manufactured (Cerec) ceramic inlays cemented with a chemically cured or dual-cured resin composite.
    Sjögren G; Molin M; van Dijken JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 15119879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of fracture resistance of pressable metal ceramic custom implant abutment with a commercially fabricated CAD/CAM zirconia implant abutment.
    Protopapadaki M; Monaco EA; Kim HI; Davis EL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):389-96. PubMed ID: 24011801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of mouth-motion fatigue and thermal cycling on the marginal accuracy of partial coverage restorations made of various dental materials.
    Stappert CF; Chitmongkolsuk S; Silva NR; Att W; Strub JR
    Dent Mater; 2008 Sep; 24(9):1248-57. PubMed ID: 18395785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    Sagsoz O; Yildiz M; Hojjat Ghahramanzadeh ASL; Alsaran A
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2018 Mar; 21(3):380-387. PubMed ID: 29519990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Influence of cavity design and restorative material on the fracture resistance of maxillary premolars.
    Cubas GB; Camacho GB; Pereira-Cenci T; Nonaka T; Barbin EL
    Gen Dent; 2010; 58(2):e84-8. PubMed ID: 20236909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fracture load of ceramic restorations after fatigue loading.
    Baladhandayutham B; Lawson NC; Burgess JO
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):266-71. PubMed ID: 25985741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM resin composite molar crowns.
    Shembish FA; Tong H; Kaizer M; Janal MN; Thompson VP; Opdam NJ; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2016 Apr; 32(4):499-509. PubMed ID: 26777092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.