These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23758600)
1. Three-dimensional cone beam computed tomographic image reorientation using soft tissues as reference for facial asymmetry diagnosis. Lee JK; Jung PK; Moon CH Angle Orthod; 2014 Jan; 84(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 23758600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of facial hard and soft tissue asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography. Nur RB; Çakan DG; Arun T Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 26827979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Morphologic evaluation and classification of facial asymmetry using 3-dimensional computed tomography. Baek C; Paeng JY; Lee JS; Hong J J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 May; 70(5):1161-9. PubMed ID: 21763045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The use of three-dimensional cephalometric references in dentoskeletal symmetry diagnosis. Porto OC; de Freitas JC; de Alencar AH; Estrela C Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(6):78-85. PubMed ID: 25628083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reproducibility of three-dimensional cephalometric landmarks in cone-beam and low-dose computed tomography. Olszewski R; Frison L; Wisniewski M; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Cosnard G; Zech F; Reychler H Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Jan; 17(1):285-92. PubMed ID: 22350037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantification of skeletal asymmetries in normal adolescents: cone-beam computed tomography analysis. Sanders DA; Chandhoke TK; Uribe FA; Rigali PH; Nanda R Prog Orthod; 2014 Apr; 15(1):26. PubMed ID: 24935152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of linear and angular measurements on three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomographic images. Moreira CR; Sales MA; Lopes PM; Cavalcanti MG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 19386521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional evaluation of craniofacial asymmetry: an analysis using computed tomography. Yáñez-Vico RM; Iglesias-Linares A; Torres-Lagares D; Gutiérrez-Pérez JL; Solano-Reina E Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Oct; 15(5):729-36. PubMed ID: 20632049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Location of facial foramina and mandibular angle from cone beam computed tomographic scans. Özgüner G; Yildirim D; Koyuncu E; Sulak O; Er SE J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):268-73. PubMed ID: 25490577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program. Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does skeletal surgery for asymmetric mandibular prognathism influence the soft tissue contour and thickness? Lee ST; Mori Y; Minami K; An CH; Park JW; Kwon TG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1577-87. PubMed ID: 23800674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane. Park JU; Kook YA; Kim Y Angle Orthod; 2012 Sep; 82(5):860-7. PubMed ID: 22356706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Correlation between hard tissue and soft tissue landmarks. Economou S; Stoustrup P; Kristensen KD; Dalstra M; Küseler A; Herlin T; Pedersen TK Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 May; 153(5):662-672.e1. PubMed ID: 29706214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mandibular dimensions of subjects with asymmetric skeletal class III malocclusion and normal occlusion compared with cone-beam computed tomography. Lee H; Bayome M; Kim SH; Kim KB; Behrents RG; Kook YA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 22858326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A three-dimensional comparison of a morphometric and conventional cephalometric midsagittal planes for craniofacial asymmetry. Damstra J; Fourie Z; De Wit M; Ren Y Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Feb; 16(1):285-94. PubMed ID: 21271348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of skeletal and dental asymmetries in Angle Class II subdivision malocclusions with cone-beam computed tomography. Minich CM; Araújo EA; Behrents RG; Buschang PH; Tanaka OM; Kim KB Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jul; 144(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 23810046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of cephalometric landmark identification on CBCT multiplanar and 3D reconstructions. Neiva MB; Soares ÁC; Lisboa Cde O; Vilella Ode V; Motta AT Angle Orthod; 2015 Jan; 85(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 24713068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional evaluation of the relationship between jaw divergence and facial soft tissue dimensions. Rongo R; Antoun JS; Lim YX; Dias G; Valletta R; Farella M Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):788-94. PubMed ID: 24559507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of craniofacial morphology in patients with and without facial asymmetry--a three-dimensional analysis with computed tomography. Kwon TG; Park HS; Ryoo HM; Lee SH Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 15925488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]