These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23758917)
1. Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). van den Akker-Scheek I; Seldentuis A; Reininga IH; Stevens M BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jun; 14():183. PubMed ID: 23758917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of psychometric properties of foot function index in Urdu-speaking population with ankle and foot disorders. Anjum A; Tauqeer S; Arooj A; Javed H; Shakeel H; Ikram A BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Sep; 25(1):751. PubMed ID: 39300395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validity and reliability of Thai version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in patients with arthritis of the foot and ankle. Angthong C Foot Ankle Surg; 2016 Dec; 22(4):224-228. PubMed ID: 27810018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Translation and validation of the German version of the foot and ankle outcome score. van Bergen CJ; Sierevelt IN; Hoogervorst P; Waizy H; van Dijk CN; Becher C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jul; 134(7):897-901. PubMed ID: 24748232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transcultural adaptation and testing psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS). Lee KM; Chung CY; Kwon SS; Sung KH; Lee SY; Won SH; Lee DJ; Lee SC; Park MS Clin Rheumatol; 2013 Oct; 32(10):1443-50. PubMed ID: 23703359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of the Dutch language version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Sierevelt IN; Beimers L; van Bergen CJA; Haverkamp D; Terwee CB; Kerkhoffs GMMJ Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2015 Aug; 23(8):2413-2419. PubMed ID: 24792074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reliability and validity of the foot and ankle outcome score: a validation study from Iran. Negahban H; Mazaheri M; Salavati M; Sohani SM; Askari M; Fanian H; Parnianpour M Clin Rheumatol; 2010 May; 29(5):479-86. PubMed ID: 20140474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Modified Foot and Ankle Score for Assessing Patient Outcomes After First Metatarsophalangeal Arthrodesis. Guo H; Xu HL; Lu H; Jiang BG J Foot Ankle Surg; 2018; 57(2):254-258. PubMed ID: 29224948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the Turkish version of the foot and ankle outcome score. Karatepe AG; Günaydin R; Kaya T; Karlibaş U; Özbek G Rheumatol Int; 2009 Dec; 30(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 19370349 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Validation of the Turkish version of the Revised Foot Function Index for patients with foot and ankle disorders. Yagci G; Erel S; Okunakol V Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Aug; 26(6):624-629. PubMed ID: 31431327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) into Spanish (Chile). Pellegrini MJ; Poniachik R; Nuñez A; Escudero MI; Carcuro G; Cortes AA Foot Ankle Surg; 2020 Oct; 26(7):790-796. PubMed ID: 31735690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle. Azam MT; Yu K; Butler J; Do H; Ellis SJ; Kennedy JG; Walls R Foot Ankle Int; 2023 Aug; 44(8):745-753. PubMed ID: 37269134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in adult acquired flatfoot deformity. Mani SB; Brown HC; Nair P; Chen L; Do HT; Lyman S; Deland JT; Ellis SJ Foot Ankle Int; 2013 Aug; 34(8):1140-6. PubMed ID: 23513031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of foot and ankle outcome score for hallux valgus. Chen L; Lyman S; Do H; Karlsson J; Adam SP; Young E; Deland JT; Ellis SJ Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1145-55. PubMed ID: 23199868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and the Self-Reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Lüring C; König D; Bouillon B Foot Ankle Surg; 2019 Jun; 25(3):361-365. PubMed ID: 30321978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT) in the Dutch population with and without complaints of ankle instability. Vuurberg G; Kluit L; van Dijk CN Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2018 Mar; 26(3):882-891. PubMed ID: 27714439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of a self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS). Cöster M; Karlsson MK; Nilsson JÅ; Carlsson A Acta Orthop; 2012 Apr; 83(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 22313352 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computerized Adaptive Tests Against the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for 6 Common Foot and Ankle Pathologies. Koltsov JCB; Greenfield ST; Soukup D; Do HT; Ellis SJ Foot Ankle Int; 2017 Aug; 38(8):870-878. PubMed ID: 28602138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Ringendahl H; Bouillon B; Eysel P; König D Foot Ankle Surg; 2018 Dec; 24(6):481-485. PubMed ID: 29409194 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the German self-reported foot and ankle score (SEFAS) in patients with foot or ankle surgery. Arbab D; Kuhlmann K; Schnurr C; Bouillon B; Lüring C; König D BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Oct; 18(1):409. PubMed ID: 29017475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]