These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376065)

  • 1. Practical considerations concerning glass ionomer cements used for basing amalgam restorations.
    O'Hara JW; McManus DB
    Compendium; 1990 Mar; 11(3):130, 132, 134-6. PubMed ID: 2376065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study.
    Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS
    Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
    Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months.
    Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of a copal varnish, ZOE or glass ionomer cement bases on microleakage of amalgam restorations.
    Manders CA; Garcia-Godoy F; Barnwell GM
    Am J Dent; 1990 Apr; 3(2):63-6. PubMed ID: 2076225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
    Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture resistance of teeth with Class 2 silver amalgam, posterior composite, and glass cermet restorations.
    Jagadish S; Yogesh BG
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(2):42-7. PubMed ID: 2374743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enamel remineralization on teeth adjacent to Class II glass ionomer restorations.
    Segura A; Donly KJ; Stratmann RG
    Am J Dent; 1997 Oct; 10(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9522700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of lining materials on shear bond strength of amalgam and gallium alloy restorations.
    Ng BP; Purton DG; Hood JA
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 9656921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Amalgam. XI. Glass-ionomer as a possible substitute of amalgam: longevity].
    Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Jan; 101(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11830988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factors associated with clinical success of cervical abrasion/erosion restorations.
    Powell LV; Johnson GH; Gordon GE
    Oper Dent; 1995; 20(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 8700767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inhibition of demineralization in vitro around amalgam restorations.
    Pimenta LA; Fontana UF; Cury JA; Serra MC; Elderton RJ
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jun; 29(6):363-7. PubMed ID: 9728147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removal of amalgam, glass-ionomer cement and compomer restorations: changes in cavity dimensions and duration of the procedure.
    Szep S; Baum C; Alamouti C; Schmidt D; Gerhardt T; Heidemann D
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):613-20. PubMed ID: 12413228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Artificial recurrent caries in glass ionomer-lined amalgam restorations.
    Garcia-Godoy F; Jesen ME
    Am J Dent; 1990 Jun; 3(3):89-93. PubMed ID: 2076235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of glass-ionomer cement and calcium hydroxide liners in amalgam restorations.
    Rabchinsky J; Donly KJ
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1993 Aug; 13(4):378-83. PubMed ID: 8300324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A rationale for use of bases with amalgam restorations.
    Bartlett DW
    Dent Update; 1992 Dec; 19(10):413-4, 416-7. PubMed ID: 1303355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RM GICs) implications for use in pediatric dentistry.
    Vaikuntam J
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 9189004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The marginal leakage of amalgam and Vitrebond restorations after an occlusal load test].
    Toschi E; Ruggeri O; Semprini P; Montanari MC; Prati C
    Minerva Stomatol; 1993; 42(11-12):487-90. PubMed ID: 8164623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Replacement of defective Class I amalgam restorations with stratified glass ionomer-composite resin materials.
    Croll TP
    Quintessence Int; 1989 Oct; 20(10):711-6. PubMed ID: 2639386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
    Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.