These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23760745)

  • 21. Complications associated with hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Shimmin AJ; Bare J; Back DL
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Apr; 36(2):187-93, ix. PubMed ID: 15833456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Understanding why metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties fail: a comparison between patients with well-functioning and revised birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasties. AAOS exhibit selection.
    Hart AJ; Matthies A; Henckel J; Ilo K; Skinner J; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Feb; 94(4):e22. PubMed ID: 22336981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear.
    Langton DJ; Joyce TJ; Jameson SS; Lord J; Van Orsouw M; Holland JP; Nargol AV; De Smet KA
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Feb; 93(2):164-71. PubMed ID: 21282753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Femoral component neck fracture after failed hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Bos PK; van Biezen FC; Weinans H
    J Arthroplasty; 2011 Dec; 26(8):1570.e1-4. PubMed ID: 21397452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Complications after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Amstutz HC; Le Duff MJ; Campbell PA; Wisk LE; Takamura KM
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2011 Apr; 42(2):207-30, viii. PubMed ID: 21435496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with 28-mm diameter metal-on-metal total hip replacement: a randomised study with six to nine years' follow-up.
    Vendittoli PA; Rivière C; Roy AG; Barry J; Lusignan D; Lavigne M
    Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11):1464-73. PubMed ID: 24151264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Clinical Performance of the ASR and ReCap Resurfacing Implants—7 Years Follow-Up.
    Borgwardt A; Borgwardt L; Borgwardt L; Zerahn B; Fabricius SD; Ribel-Madsen S
    J Arthroplasty; 2015 Jun; 30(6):993-7. PubMed ID: 25720854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimum 5-year follow-up after Cormet hip resurfacing. A single surgeon series of 234 hips.
    Kordás G; Baxter J; Parsons N; Costa ML; Krikler SJ
    Hip Int; 2012; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 22505179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Wear analysis of 39 conserve plus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing retrievals.
    Takamura KM; Amstutz HC; Lu Z; Campbell PA; Ebramzadeh E
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):410-5. PubMed ID: 23845764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing.
    Glyn-Jones S; Pandit H; Kwon YM; Doll H; Gill HS; Murray DW
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Dec; 91(12):1566-74. PubMed ID: 19949118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Residual groin pain at a minimum of two years after metal-on-metal THA with a twenty-eight-millimeter femoral head, THA with a large-diameter femoral head, and hip resurfacing.
    Lavigne M; Laffosse JM; Ganapathi M; Girard J; Vendittoli P
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():93-8. PubMed ID: 21543697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and Functional Outcomes of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing System.
    Pascual-Garrido C; Morris BL; Dayton MR
    Orthopedics; 2016; 39(2):e236-9. PubMed ID: 26840695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prevalence of dysplasia as the source of worse outcome in young female patients after hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gross TP; Liu F
    Int Orthop; 2012 Jan; 36(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 21647734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. One-component revision of failed hip resurfacing from adverse reaction to metal wear debris.
    Pritchett JW
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):219-24. PubMed ID: 23680501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a flattened press-fit acetabular component in osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis: a prospective study on 416 hips with 6-10 years follow-up.
    Zwartelé RE; Olsthoorn PG; Pöll RG; Brand R; Doets HC
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Dec; 128(12):1379-86. PubMed ID: 18758793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraoperative radiographs for placing acetabular components in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.
    Gross TP; Liu F; Webb L
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 469(6):1554-9. PubMed ID: 21108028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: mid-term results in 486 cases and current indication in our institution.
    Ribas M; Cardenas C; Astarita E; Moya E; Bellotti V
    Hip Int; 2014 Oct; 24 Suppl 10():S19-24. PubMed ID: 24970031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do hardened femoral heads reduce blood metal ion concentrations after hip resurfacing?
    Le Duff MJ; Johnson AJ; Amstutz HC
    Hip Int; 2014; 24(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 24970325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fixation, survival, and dislocation of jumbo acetabular components in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Mar; 95(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 23515989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.