These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376078)
61. Comparison of biphasic and monophasic pulses: does the advantage of biphasic shocks depend on the waveshape? Natale A; Sra J; Krum D; Dhala A; Deshpande S; Jazayeri M; Axtell K; Degroot P; VanHout WL; Akhtar M Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jul; 18(7):1354-61. PubMed ID: 7567587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Improved internal defibrillation efficacy with a biphasic waveform. Fain ES; Sweeney MB; Franz MR Am Heart J; 1989 Feb; 117(2):358-64. PubMed ID: 2916410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Ventricular pacing threshold after transthoracic external defibrillation with two different waveforms: an experimental study. Assumpção AC; de Oliveira PP; Vilarinho KA; Eghtesady P; Silveira Filho LM; Lavagnoli CF; Severino ES; Petrucci O Europace; 2013 Feb; 15(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 23143858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation. Rho RW; Page RL Card Electrophysiol Rev; 2003 Sep; 7(3):290-1. PubMed ID: 14739730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A framework of current based defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of biphasic truncated exponential waveform in rabbits. Li W; Li J; Wei L; Wang J; Peng L; Wang J; Yin C; Li Y Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1586. PubMed ID: 33452293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Effects of transvenous electrode polarity and waveform duration on the relationship between defibrillation threshold and upper limit of vulnerability. Huang J; KenKnight BH; Walcott GP; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circulation; 1997 Aug; 96(4):1351-9. PubMed ID: 9286969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL Investigators. Mittal S; Ayati S; Stein KM; Knight BP; Morady F; Schwartzman D; Cavlovich D; Platia EV; Calkins H; Tchou PJ; Miller JM; Wharton JM; Sung RJ; Slotwiner DJ; Markowitz SM; Lerman BB J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Nov; 34(5):1595-601. PubMed ID: 10551711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Comparison of monophasic with single and dual capacitor biphasic waveforms for nonthoracotomy canine internal defibrillation. Chapman PD; Vetter JW; Souza JJ; Wetherbee JN; Troup PJ J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jul; 14(1):242-5. PubMed ID: 2738266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. [Impact of electrical shock waveform and paddle positions on efficacy of direct current cardioversion for atrial fibrillation]. Stanaitiene G; Babarskiene RM Medicina (Kaunas); 2008; 44(9):665-72. PubMed ID: 18971603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Biphasic and monophasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation: a meta analysis of randomised controlled trials. Faddy SC; Powell J; Craig JC Resuscitation; 2003 Jul; 58(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 12867304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Mechanisms of electrical defibrillation: impact of new experimental defibrillator waveforms. Blanchard SM; Ideker RE Am Heart J; 1994 Apr; 127(4 Pt 2):970-7. PubMed ID: 8160601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Walsh SJ; Manoharan G; Escalona OJ; Santos J; Evans N; Anderson JM; Stevenson M; Allen JD; Adgey AA Europace; 2006 Oct; 8(10):873-80. PubMed ID: 17000635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Surgical open-chest ventricular defibrillation: triphasic waveforms are superior to biphasic waveforms. Zhang Y; Boddicker KA; Davies LR; Jones JL; Kerber RE Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul; 27(7):941-8. PubMed ID: 15271014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Waveform optimization for internal atrial defibrillation: effects of waveform rounding, phase duration, and voltage swing. Kidwai BJ; Allen JD; Harbinson MT; McIntyre A; Anderson J; Adgey AA Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Aug; 24(8 Pt 1):1198-207. PubMed ID: 11523604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Prospective comparison of biphasic and monophasic shocks for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators using endocardial leads. Saksena S; An H; Mehra R; DeGroot P; Krol RB; Burkhardt E; Mehta D; John T Am J Cardiol; 1992 Aug; 70(3):304-10. PubMed ID: 1632393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Biphasic shocks compared with monophasic damped sine wave shocks for direct ventricular defibrillation during open heart surgery. Schwarz B; Bowdle TA; Jett GK; Mair P; Lindner KH; Aldea GS; Lazzara RG; O'Grady SG; Schmitt PW; Walker RG; Chapman FW; Tacker WA Anesthesiology; 2003 May; 98(5):1063-9. PubMed ID: 12717126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effects of monophasic and biphasic shocks on action potentials during ventricular fibrillation in dogs. Zhou X; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Afework Y; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circ Res; 1993 Aug; 73(2):325-34. PubMed ID: 8330375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks. Katz A; Sweeney RJ; Gill RM; Reid PR; Prystowsky EN Circulation; 1999 Sep; 100(10):1125-30. PubMed ID: 10477539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]