These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376113)

  • 1. SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.
    Phaf RH; Van der Heijden AH; Hudson PT
    Cogn Psychol; 1990 Jul; 22(3):273-341. PubMed ID: 2376113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: a psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow.
    Smid HG; Mulder G; Mulder LJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Aug; 74(2-3):169-201. PubMed ID: 2251928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action.
    Tipper SP; Brehaut JC; Driver J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):492-504. PubMed ID: 2144566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.
    Shiu LP; Kornblum S
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 10598474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probability matching in visual selective attention.
    van der Heijden AH
    Can J Psychol; 1989 Mar; 43(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 2819598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An object-based cost of visual filtering.
    Chen Z
    Percept Psychophys; 2000 Apr; 62(3):482-95. PubMed ID: 10909239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonstrategic contributions to putatively strategic effects in selective attention tasks.
    Risko EF; Blais C; Stolz JA; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1044-52. PubMed ID: 18665744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responses of hippocampal formation neurons in the monkey related to delayed spatial response and object-place memory tasks.
    Cahusac PM; Miyashita Y; Rolls ET
    Behav Brain Res; 1989 Jul; 33(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 2757782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Making two responses to a single object: implications for the central attentional bottleneck.
    Fagot C; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1058-79. PubMed ID: 1431744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.
    Kornblum S; Hasbroucq T; Osman A
    Psychol Rev; 1990 Apr; 97(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 2186425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feature integration in the mapping of multi-attribute visual stimuli to responses.
    Ishizaki T; Morita H; Morita M
    Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():9056. PubMed ID: 25762010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Channel interaction and the redundant-targets effect in bimodal divided attention.
    Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):160-9. PubMed ID: 1826309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choice and response time processes in the identification and categorization of unidimensional stimuli.
    Lacouture Y; Marley AA
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Oct; 66(7):1206-26. PubMed ID: 15751477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Determinants of the benefit for consistent stimulus-response mappings in dual-task performance of four-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 May; 71(4):734-56. PubMed ID: 19429956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):212-38. PubMed ID: 12120784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: voluntary versus automatic allocation.
    Yantis S; Jonides J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Feb; 16(1):121-34. PubMed ID: 2137514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.