These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376113)

  • 21. Priming effects in perceptual classification.
    Flowers JH
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Feb; 47(2):135-48. PubMed ID: 2304812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A theory of visual attention.
    Bundesen C
    Psychol Rev; 1990 Oct; 97(4):523-47. PubMed ID: 2247540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. More insight into the interplay of response selection and visual attention in dual-tasks: masked visual search and response selection are performed in parallel.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Psychol Res; 2019 Apr; 83(3):459-475. PubMed ID: 28917014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning.
    Roelofs A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1580-98. PubMed ID: 19045994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Testing a semistochastic variant of the interactive activation model in different word recognition experiments.
    Jacobs AM; Grainger J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):1174-88. PubMed ID: 1431751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The availability versus the use of partial information: multiple levels of selective processing between perception and action.
    Smid HG; Mulder G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1995 Nov; 90(1-3):145-62. PubMed ID: 8525869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.
    Waldron EM; Ashby FG
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Mar; 8(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 11340863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Directing spatial attention within an object: altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions.
    Peterson MA; Gibson BS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):170-182. PubMed ID: 1826310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective attention to global and local structure of objects: alternative measures of nontarget processing.
    Briand KA
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 May; 55(5):562-74. PubMed ID: 8008557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A paradoxical exposure-duration effect in the Stroop task: temporal segregation between stimulus attributes facilitates selection.
    La Heij W; van der Heijden AH; Plooij P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):622-32. PubMed ID: 11424649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum?
    Cowell RA; Bussey TJ; Saksida LM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2460-79. PubMed ID: 19929757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is evidence for late selection due to automatic or attentional processing of stimulus identities?
    Fournier LR; Shorter S
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):991-1003. PubMed ID: 11578060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Shifting visual attention and selecting motor responses: distinct attentional mechanisms.
    Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Nov; 17(4):1023-40. PubMed ID: 1837295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Orienting in space and time: joint contributions to exogenous spatial cuing effects.
    Milliken B; Lupiáñez J; Roberts M; Stevanovski B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Dec; 10(4):877-83. PubMed ID: 15000534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Success and failure at dual-task coordination by younger and older adults.
    Hartley AA; Maquestiaux F
    Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 17563177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The asynchronous discrete coding model: further tests with single-attribute stimuli.
    Trevena JA; Miller J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Nov; 60(8):1344-56. PubMed ID: 9865076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Response time distributions and the Stroop Task: a test of the Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland (1990) model.
    Mewhort DJ; Braun JG; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):872-82. PubMed ID: 1500881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Covert processing of visual form in the absence of area LO.
    Kentridge RW; Heywood CA; Milner AD
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1488-95. PubMed ID: 15246286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.