BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

969 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23761554)

  • 1. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
    Khawaja RD; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karaosmanoglu A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
    Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraindividual comparison of diagnostic performance in patients with hepatic metastasis of full-dose standard and half-dose iterative reconstructions with dual-source abdominal computed tomography.
    Park M; Chung YE; Lee HS; Choi JY; Park MS; Kim MJ; Kim KW
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 24300843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of a model-based, iterative reconstruction algorithm (MBIR) regarding image quality and dose reduction in liver computed tomography.
    Chang W; Lee JM; Lee K; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Han JK; Choi BI
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Aug; 48(8):598-606. PubMed ID: 23511193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Low-dose computed tomographic urography using adaptive iterative dose reduction 3-dimensional: comparison with routine-dose computed tomography with filtered back projection.
    Juri H; Matsuki M; Inada Y; Tsuboyama T; Kumano S; Azuma H; Narumi Y
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 23674016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of bladder cancer: comparison of low-dose scans with AIDR 3D and routine-dose scans with FBP on the excretory phase in CT urography.
    Juri H; Tsuboyama T; Kumano S; Inada Y; Koyama M; Azuma H; Narumi Y
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150495. PubMed ID: 26642306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
    Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults.
    Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Sullivan J; Denson LA; Zhang B; Salisbury SR; Towbin AJ
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25654668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
    van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of image quality and radiation dose reduction in upper abdominal computed tomography using model-based iterative reconstruction; comparison with filtered back projection and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction.
    Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Onishi H; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Sep; 84(9):1715-23. PubMed ID: 26037266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT Dose Reduction for Visceral Adipose Tissue Measurement: Effects of Model-Based and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstructions and Filtered Back Projection.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Niijima Y; Hashimoto M; Yamada M; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jun; 204(6):W677-83. PubMed ID: 26001256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V technique for radiation dose reduction in abdominal CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
    Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Kim D; Cho J; Kim S; Lee S; Lee J
    Br J Radiol; 2015 Oct; 88(1054):20150463. PubMed ID: 26234823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
    Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Impact of Different Levels of Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3D on Image Quality of 320-Row Coronary CT Angiography: A Clinical Trial.
    Feger S; Rief M; Zimmermann E; Martus P; Schuijf JD; Blobel J; Richter F; Dewey M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125943. PubMed ID: 25945924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.