117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23761557)
1. Impact of slice thickness on semi-automated measurements for volume and whole-tumor attenuation of colorectal hepatic metastases in multislice computed tomography.
Rao SX; Meng T; Zhang LJ; Zeng MS
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):863-8. PubMed ID: 23761557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Hepatic tumors: region-of-interest versus volumetric analysis for quantification of attenuation at CT.
Chalian H; Tochetto SM; Töre HG; Rezai P; Yaghmai V
Radiology; 2012 Mar; 262(3):853-61. PubMed ID: 22357887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Semi-automated quantification of hepatic lesions in a phantom.
Keil S; Plumhans C; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Suehling M; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Das M
Invest Radiol; 2009 Feb; 44(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 19104439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability.
Puesken M; Buerke B; Fortkamp R; Koch R; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
Rofo; 2011 Apr; 183(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 21246480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of kernels used for the reconstruction of MDCT datasets on the semi-automated segmentation and volumetry of liver lesions.
Pinto dos Santos D; Kloeckner R; Wunder K; Bornemann L; Düber C; Mildenberger P
Rofo; 2014 Aug; 186(8):780-4. PubMed ID: 24458377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volume measurement of liver metastases using multidetector computed tomography: comparison of lesion diameter and volume segmentation - a phantom study.
Rothe JH; Steffen IG; Lehmkuhl L; Grieser C; Mussler A; Schnapauff D; Stelter L; Denecke T
Rofo; 2010 Dec; 182(12):1082-90. PubMed ID: 21104596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Response Evaluation of Malignant Liver Lesions After TACE/SIRT: Comparison of Manual and Semi-Automatic Measurement of Different Response Criteria in Multislice CT.
Höink AJ; Schülke C; Koch R; Löhnert A; Kammerer S; Fortkamp R; Heindel W; Buerke B
Rofo; 2017 Nov; 189(11):1067-1075. PubMed ID: 28834965
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Suitability of semi-automated tumor response assessment of liver metastases using a dedicated software package.
Kalkmann J; Ladd SC; de Greiff A; Forsting M; Stattaus J
Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 20419616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical lymph node staging--influence of slice thickness and reconstruction kernel on volumetry and RECIST measurements.
Fabel M; Wulff A; Heckel F; Bornemann L; Freitag-Wolf S; Heller M; Biederer J; Bolte H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3124-30. PubMed ID: 22464844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Semiautomatic lymph node segmentation in multislice computed tomography: impact of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision, and interobserver variability.
Buerke B; Puesken M; Beyer F; Gerss J; Weckesser M; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 20027120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semiautomated versus manual evaluation of liver metastases treated by radiofrequency ablation.
Keil S; Bruners P; Ohnsorge L; Plumhans C; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Sühling M; Günther RW; Das M; Mahnken AH
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 20123208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms.
Rothe JH; Grieser C; Lehmkuhl L; Schnapauff D; Fernandez CP; Maurer MH; Mussler A; Hamm B; Denecke T; Steffen IG
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1831-9. PubMed ID: 22717124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases-software-assisted evaluation of the ablation zone in MDCT: tumor-free follow-up versus local recurrent disease.
Keil S; Bruners P; Schiffl K; Sedlmair M; Mühlenbruch G; Günther RW; Das M; Mahnken AH
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):297-306. PubMed ID: 19688366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A semi-automated volumetric software for segmentation and perfusion parameter quantification of brain tumors using 320-row multidetector computed tomography: a validation study.
Chae SY; Suh S; Ryoo I; Park A; Noh KJ; Shim H; Seol HY
Neuroradiology; 2017 May; 59(5):461-469. PubMed ID: 28341992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose reduction for semi-automated volumetry of hepatic metastasis in MDCT studies.
Keil S; Plumhans C; Nagy IA; Schiffl K; Soza G; Behrendt FF; Mahnken AH; Günther RW; Das M
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 20027116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Semiautomated Renal Cortex Volumetry in Multislice Computed Tomography: Effect of Slice Thickness and Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms.
Houbois C; Haneder S; Merkt M; Holz JA; Morelli J; Kiel A; Doerner J; Maintz D; Puesken M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2020; 44(2):236-241. PubMed ID: 32195802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Volumetric evaluation of hepatic tumors: multi-vendor, multi-reader liver phantom study.
Lubner MG; Dustin Pooler B; del Rio AM; Durkee B; Pickhardt PJ
Abdom Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(3):488-96. PubMed ID: 24492936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pulmonary nodule volumetric measurement variability as a function of CT slice thickness and nodule morphology.
Petrou M; Quint LE; Nan B; Baker LH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 17242235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tumor growth kinetics versus RECIST to assess response to locoregional therapy in breast cancer liver metastases.
Seyal AR; Parekh K; Velichko YS; Salem R; Yaghmai V
Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):950-7. PubMed ID: 24833565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric measurement of hepatic tumors: Accuracy of manual contouring using CT with volumetric pathology as the reference method.
Pupulim LF; Ronot M; Paradis V; Chemouny S; Vilgrain V
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2018 Feb; 99(2):83-89. PubMed ID: 29221936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
