These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376169)
1. Flow characteristics of bioprosthetic heart valves. Rashtian MY; Stevenson DM; Allen DT; Yoganathan AP; Harrison EC; Edmiston WA; Rahimtoola SH Chest; 1990 Aug; 98(2):365-75. PubMed ID: 2376169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves. Bove EL; Marvasti MA; Potts JL; Reger MJ; Zamora JL; Eich RH; Parker FB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive assessment by Doppler ultrasound of 155 patients with bioprosthetic valves: a comparison of the Wessex porcine, low profile Ionescu-Shiley, and Hancock pericardial bioprostheses. Simpson IA; Reece IJ; Houston AB; Hutton I; Wheatley DJ; Cobbe SM Br Heart J; 1986 Jul; 56(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 3524634 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An emergency physician's guide to prosthetic heart valves: identification and hemodynamic function. Harrison EC; Rashtian MY; Allen DT; Yoganathan AP; Rahimtoola SH Ann Emerg Med; 1988 Mar; 17(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 3345013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Flow characteristics of four commonly used mechanical heart valves. Rashtian MY; Stevenson DM; Allen DT; Yoganathan AP; Harrison EC; Edmiston WA; Faughan P; Rahimtoola SH Am J Cardiol; 1986 Oct; 58(9):743-52. PubMed ID: 3766415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo hemodynamics of prosthetic St. Jude Medical and Ionescu-Shiley heart valves analyzed by computer. Kawachi Y; Tokunaga K; Watanabe Y; Nose Y; Nakamura M Ann Thorac Surg; 1985 May; 39(5):456-61. PubMed ID: 3994447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves. Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study. Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve bioprostheses. Gabbay S; McQueen DM; Yellin EL; Frater RW Circulation; 1979 Aug; 60(2 Pt 2):62-70. PubMed ID: 445776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Advances in prosthetic heart valves: fluid mechanics of aortic valve designs. Yoganathan AP; Woo YR; Sung HW; Jones M J Biomater Appl; 1988 Apr; 2(4):579-614. PubMed ID: 2974076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Trans-catheter valve-in-valve implantation: in vitro hydrodynamic performance of the SAPIEN+cloth trans-catheter heart valve in the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount valves. Walther T; Dehdashtian MM; Khanna R; Young E; Goldbrunner PJ; Lee W Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Nov; 40(5):1120-6. PubMed ID: 21466959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Six month postoperative hemodynamics of the Hancock heterograft and the Björk-Shiley prosthesis: results of a Veterans Administration cooperative prospective randomized trial. Khuri SF; Folland ED; Sethi GK; Souchek J; Oprian C; Wong M; Burchfiel C; Henderson WG; Hammermeister KE J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Jul; 12(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 3288680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hemodynamic comparison of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprosthetic valves. Khan S; Mitchell RS; Derby GC; Oyer PE; Miller DC Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV75-81. PubMed ID: 2225438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves. Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves]. Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Velocity fields and turbulent stresses downstream of biological and mechanical aortic valve prostheses implanted in pigs. Hasenkam JM; Pedersen EM; Ostergaard JH; Nygaard H; Paulsen PK; Johannsen G; Schurizek BA Cardiovasc Res; 1988 Jul; 22(7):472-83. PubMed ID: 3252971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]