These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23761698)

  • 1. State dependence of adaptation of force output following movement observation.
    Wanda PA; Li G; Thoroughman KA
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Sep; 110(5):1246-56. PubMed ID: 23761698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The decay of motor adaptation to novel movement dynamics reveals an asymmetry in the stability of motion state-dependent learning.
    Hosseini EA; Nguyen KP; Joiner WM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 May; 13(5):e1005492. PubMed ID: 28481891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Characterization of age-related modifications of upper limb motor control strategies in a new dynamic environment.
    Cesqui B; Macrì G; Dario P; Micera S
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2008 Nov; 5():31. PubMed ID: 19019228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motion state-dependent motor learning based on explicit visual feedback is quickly recalled, but is less stable than adaptation to physical perturbations.
    Zhou W; Kruse EA; Brower R; North R; Joiner WM
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Oct; 128(4):854-871. PubMed ID: 36043804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modulation of internal model formation during force field-induced motor learning by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of primary motor cortex.
    Hunter T; Sacco P; Nitsche MA; Turner DL
    J Physiol; 2009 Jun; 587(Pt 12):2949-61. PubMed ID: 19403605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
    Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Manipulating visual-motor experience to probe for observation-induced after-effects in adaptation learning.
    Lim SB; Larssen BC; Hodges NJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2014 Mar; 232(3):789-802. PubMed ID: 24306438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporal specificity of the initial adaptive response in motor adaptation.
    Joiner WM; Sing GC; Smith MA
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005438. PubMed ID: 28692658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of online visual feedback on motor acquisition and retention when learning to reach in a force field.
    Batcho CS; Gagné M; Bouyer LJ; Roy JS; Mercier C
    Neuroscience; 2016 Nov; 337():267-275. PubMed ID: 27646292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing explicit strategies in force field adaptation.
    Schween R; McDougle SD; Hegele M; Taylor JA
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Apr; 123(4):1552-1565. PubMed ID: 32208878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model.
    Franklin DW; Osu R; Burdet E; Kawato M; Milner TE
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Nov; 90(5):3270-82. PubMed ID: 14615432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation paths to novel motor tasks are shaped by prior structure learning.
    Kobak D; Mehring C
    J Neurosci; 2012 Jul; 32(29):9898-908. PubMed ID: 22815505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sequence, time, or state representation: how does the motor control system adapt to variable environments?
    Karniel A; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    Biol Cybern; 2003 Jul; 89(1):10-21. PubMed ID: 12836029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of haptic guidance in learning a novel visuomotor task.
    van Asseldonk EH; Wessels M; Stienen AH; van der Helm FC; van der Kooij H
    J Physiol Paris; 2009; 103(3-5):276-85. PubMed ID: 19665551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Limb motion dictates how motor learning arises from arbitrary environmental dynamics.
    Sing GC; Orozco SP; Smith MA
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 May; 109(10):2466-82. PubMed ID: 23365184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Movements following force-field adaptation are aligned with altered sense of limb position.
    Ohashi H; Valle-Mena R; Gribble PL; Ostry DJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1303-1313. PubMed ID: 30863880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Time course of changes in the long-latency feedback response parallels the fast process of short-term motor adaptation.
    Coltman SK; Gribble PL
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Aug; 124(2):388-399. PubMed ID: 32639925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brevity of haptic force perturbations induces heightened adaptive sensitivity.
    Wanda PA; Fine MS; Weeks HM; Gross AM; Macy JL; Thoroughman KA
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 May; 226(3):407-20. PubMed ID: 23468159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Novel strategies in feedforward adaptation to a position-dependent perturbation.
    Hinder MR; Milner TE
    Exp Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 165(2):239-49. PubMed ID: 15856204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scaling down motor memories: de-adaptation after motor learning.
    Davidson PR; Wolpert DM
    Neurosci Lett; 2004 Nov; 370(2-3):102-7. PubMed ID: 15488303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.