These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23763387)

  • 1. Quantifying the hurricane catastrophe risk to offshore wind power.
    Rose S; Jaramillo P; Small MJ; Apt J
    Risk Anal; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2126-41. PubMed ID: 23763387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the hurricane risk to offshore wind turbines.
    Rose S; Jaramillo P; Small MJ; Grossmann I; Apt J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Feb; 109(9):3247-52. PubMed ID: 22331894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Foundations for offshore wind turbines.
    Byrne BW; Houlsby GT
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2003 Dec; 361(1813):2909-30. PubMed ID: 14667305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Potential visibility, growth, and technological innovation in offshore wind turbines installed in Europe.
    Bilgili M; Alphan H; Ilhan A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Feb; 30(10):27208-27226. PubMed ID: 36378387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk analysis for U.S. offshore wind farms: the need for an integrated approach.
    Staid A; Guikema SD
    Risk Anal; 2015 Apr; 35(4):587-93. PubMed ID: 25691292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling and Simulation of Offshore Wind Power Platform for 5 MW Baseline NREL Turbine.
    Roni Sahroni T
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2015; 2015():819384. PubMed ID: 26550605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How loud is the underwater noise from operating offshore wind turbines?
    Tougaard J; Hermannsen L; Madsen PT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):2885. PubMed ID: 33261376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison between the dynamics of horizontal and vertical axis offshore floating wind turbines.
    Borg M; Collu M
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Feb; 373(2035):. PubMed ID: 25583856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changing vessel routes could significantly reduce the cost of future offshore wind projects.
    Samoteskul K; Firestone J; Corbett J; Callahan J
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Aug; 141():146-54. PubMed ID: 24794388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Levelized cost of offshore wind power in China.
    Xu Y; Yang K; Yuan J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 May; 28(20):25614-25627. PubMed ID: 33462695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantifying avian avoidance of offshore wind turbines: Current evidence and key knowledge gaps.
    Cook ASCP; Humphreys EM; Bennet F; Masden EA; Burton NHK
    Mar Environ Res; 2018 Sep; 140():278-288. PubMed ID: 29980294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epifauna dynamics at an offshore foundation--implications of future wind power farming in the North Sea.
    Krone R; Gutow L; Joschko TJ; Schröder A
    Mar Environ Res; 2013 Apr; 85():1-12. PubMed ID: 23312860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aspects of structural health and condition monitoring of offshore wind turbines.
    Antoniadou I; Dervilis N; Papatheou E; Maguire AE; Worden K
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Feb; 373(2035):. PubMed ID: 25583864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Offshore and onshore wind turbine blade waste material forecast at a regional level in Europe until 2050.
    Lichtenegger G; Rentizelas AA; Trivyza N; Siegl S
    Waste Manag; 2020 Apr; 106():120-131. PubMed ID: 32203899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Aerodynamic efficiency assessment of a cross-axis wind turbine integrated with an offshore deflector.
    Saham S; Rezaey S
    Heliyon; 2024 Sep; 10(17):e36412. PubMed ID: 39263090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wind speed reductions by large-scale wind turbine deployments lower turbine efficiencies and set low generation limits.
    Miller LM; Kleidon A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(48):13570-13575. PubMed ID: 27849587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment and Analysis of QuikSCAT Vector Wind Products for the Gulf of Mexico: A Long-Term and Hurricane Analysis.
    Sharma N; D'Sa E
    Sensors (Basel); 2008 Mar; 8(3):1927-1949. PubMed ID: 27879803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transporting offshore wind power in the Western Gulf of Mexico: retrofitting existing assets for power transmission via green hydrogen-a review.
    Spezakis Z; Xydis G
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Sep; 30(44):99088-99099. PubMed ID: 36171321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geophysical potential for wind energy over the open oceans.
    Possner A; Caldeira K
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Oct; 114(43):11338-11343. PubMed ID: 29073053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficient preliminary floating offshore wind turbine design and testing methodologies and application to a concrete spar design.
    Matha D; Sandner F; Molins C; Campos A; Cheng PW
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2015 Feb; 373(2035):. PubMed ID: 25583870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.