These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23763530)

  • 1. A literature review of cost-effectiveness analyses of prostate-specific antigen test in prostate cancer screening.
    Garg V; Gu NY; Borrego ME; Raisch DW
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2013 Jun; 13(3):327-42. PubMed ID: 23763530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Economic Analysis.
    Tawfik A
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(11):1-37. PubMed ID: 26366237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-effectiveness of percent free PSA for prostate cancer detection in men with a total PSA of 4-10 ng/ml.
    Bermúdez-Tamayo C; Martín Martín JJ; González Mdel P; Pérez Romero C
    Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):336-44. PubMed ID: 18025853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prostate cancer screening practices in a large, integrated health system: 2007-2014.
    Misra-Hebert AD; Hu B; Klein EA; Stephenson A; Taksler GB; Kattan MW; Rothberg MB
    BJU Int; 2017 Aug; 120(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 28139034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prostate-specific antigen levels in the United States: implications of various definitions for abnormal.
    Welch HG; Schwartz LM; Woloshin S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(15):1132-7. PubMed ID: 16077071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)-Based Population Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    Pron G
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2015; 15(10):1-64. PubMed ID: 26366236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Economic evaluation of prostate cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen.
    Imamura T; Yasunaga H
    Int J Urol; 2008 Apr; 15(4):285-8. PubMed ID: 18380812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness analysis of PSA-based mass screening: Evidence from a randomised controlled trial combined with register data.
    Booth N; Rissanen P; Tammela TLJ; Kujala P; Stenman UH; Taari K; Talala K; Auvinen A
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0224479. PubMed ID: 31689326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Annual PSA tests are not necessary for men with a PSA level below 2 ng/mL: findings of the Imari prostate cancer screening program.
    Uozumi J; Tokuda Y; Fujiyama C; Takagi N; Meiri H; Kuratomi K; Nakamura K; Ichigi Y; Yoshinaga H; Kinoshita N; Masaki Z
    Int J Urol; 2002 Jun; 9(6):334-9. PubMed ID: 12110098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost implications of PSA screening differ by age.
    Rao K; Liang S; Cardamone M; Joshu CE; Marmen K; Bhavsar N; Nelson WG; Ballentine Carter H; Albert MC; Platz EA; Pollack CE
    BMC Urol; 2018 May; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 29743049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Health Index for prostate cancer detection.
    Nichol MB; Wu J; Huang J; Denham D; Frencher SK; Jacobsen SJ
    BJU Int; 2012 Aug; 110(3):353-62. PubMed ID: 22077934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Prostate Cancer Screening in Australia.
    Keller A; Gericke C; Whitty JA; Yaxley J; Kua B; Coughlin G; Gianduzzo T
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2017 Feb; 15(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 27757918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Economic Analysis of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening and Selective Treatment Strategies.
    Roth JA; Gulati R; Gore JL; Cooperberg MR; Etzioni R
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jul; 2(7):890-8. PubMed ID: 27010943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for prostate cancer: a guidance statement from the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians.
    Qaseem A; Barry MJ; Denberg TD; Owens DK; Shekelle P;
    Ann Intern Med; 2013 May; 158(10):761-769. PubMed ID: 23567643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing and referral patterns in the years surrounding the US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation against prostate-specific antigen screening.
    Hutchinson R; Akhtar A; Haridas J; Bhat D; Roehrborn C; Lotan Y
    Cancer; 2016 Dec; 122(24):3785-3793. PubMed ID: 27658175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Lin K; Lipsitz R; Miller T; Janakiraman S;
    Ann Intern Med; 2008 Aug; 149(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 18678846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current and projected annual direct costs of screening asymptomatic men for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen.
    Krahn MD; Coombs A; Levy IG
    CMAJ; 1999 Jan; 160(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 9934343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. PSA-based screening for prostate cancer. Too many adverse effects.
    Prescrire Int; 2012 Sep; 21(130):215-7. PubMed ID: 23016259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Polygenic risk-tailored screening for prostate cancer: A benefit-harm and cost-effectiveness modelling study.
    Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Eeles R; Kote-Jarai Z; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
    PLoS Med; 2019 Dec; 16(12):e1002998. PubMed ID: 31860675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. American Urological Association (AUA) guideline on prostate cancer detection: process and rationale.
    Carter HB
    BJU Int; 2013 Sep; 112(5):543-7. PubMed ID: 23924423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.