These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23763787)

  • 1. Direct transfer of the position of digitized casts to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Etxaniz O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jun; 109(6):411-4. PubMed ID: 23763787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Improved digital transfer of the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Mínguez R; Etxaniz O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 24836282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Investigation of influencing variables on the computer-aided simulation of contacts in dynamic occlusion based on optically digitized plaster casts].
    Böröcz Z; Dirksen D; Thomas C; Runte C; Bollmann F; von Bally G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2004 May; 49(5):111-6. PubMed ID: 15212195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer-assisted three-dimensional surgical planning: 3D virtual articulator: technical note.
    Ghanai S; Marmulla R; Wiechnik J; Mühling J; Kotrikova B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 39(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 20005674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of transferring analog dental casts to a virtual articulator.
    Úry E; Fornai C; Weber GW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Feb; 123(2):305-313. PubMed ID: 31227241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Virtual facebow technique.
    Solaberrieta E; Garmendia A; Minguez R; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):751-5. PubMed ID: 26372628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digitizing the Facebow: A Clinician/Technician Communication Tool.
    Kalman L; Chrapka J; Joseph Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):35-7. PubMed ID: 26757326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mounting casts on a mechanical articulator by using digital multisource data: A dental technique.
    Kim JE; Kim SJ; Kwon DH; Shim JS; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 32033790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The virtual articulator.
    Bisler A; Bockholt U; Kordass B; Suchan M; Voss G
    Int J Comput Dent; 2002; 5(2-3):101-6. PubMed ID: 12680040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A digital approach to the evaluation of mandibular position by using a virtual articulator.
    Park JH; Lee GH; Moon DN; Kim JC; Park M; Lee KM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):849-853. PubMed ID: 32624222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determining the accuracy of articulator interchangeability and hinge axis reproducibility.
    Hatzi P; Millstein P; Maya A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):236-45. PubMed ID: 11264930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the digital workflow: direct transfer from patient to virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Minguez R; Etxaniz O; Barrenetxea L
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(4):285-92. PubMed ID: 24555405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Articulator-related registration--a simple concept for minimizing eccentric occlusal errors in the articulator.
    Pröschel P; Morneburg T; Hugger A; Kordass B; Ottl P; Niedermeier W; Wichmann M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 12066493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the accuracy of the three-dimensional virtual method and the conventional manual method for model surgery and intermediate wafer fabrication.
    Song KG; Baek SH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 18755612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the requirements, section quantity, and dimension of the virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Arias A; Brizuela A; Garikano X; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jan; 115(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 26386482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital to Analog Facially Generated Interchangeable Facebow Transfer: Capturing a Standardized Reference Position.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Zeitler JM; Martin J
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):13-22. PubMed ID: 34605582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimal Use of Physical Centric Relation Records for Digital Workflows.
    Osnes C; Patel J; Wagstaff A; Ferrari M; Keeling A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Nov; 29(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 34218536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.