These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376408)

  • 1. Proximity compatibility and information display: effects of color, space, and object display on information integration.
    Wickens CD; Andre AD
    Hum Factors; 1990 Feb; 32(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 2376408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Target cuing in visual search: the effects of conformality and display location on the allocation of visual attention.
    Yeh M; Wickens CD; Seagull FJ
    Hum Factors; 1999 Dec; 41(4):524-42. PubMed ID: 10774124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Superimposition, symbology, visual attention, and the head-up display.
    Martin-Emerson R; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 1997 Dec; 39(4):581-601. PubMed ID: 11536851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Head-up displays: effects of clutter, display intensity, and display location on pilot performance.
    Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1998; 8(4):377-403. PubMed ID: 11542276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Head up versus head down: the costs of imprecision, unreliability, and visual clutter on cue effectiveness for display signaling.
    Yeh M; Merlo JL; Wickens CD; Brandenburg DL
    Hum Factors; 2003; 45(3):390-407. PubMed ID: 14702991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of extraneous targets on identification of color-coded targets.
    Luria SM; Neri DF; Shim MJ; Bivenour R
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1991 Jun; 62(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 1859340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Distributed representation as a principle for the analysis of cockpit information displays.
    Zhang J
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1997; 7(2):105-21. PubMed ID: 11541073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Reliability design and analysis of man-machine performance of display and illumination system in cockpit].
    Wu W; Jiang G; Liao G; Zhong H; Mu X; Wang Y
    Space Med Med Eng (Beijing); 1998 Feb; 11(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 11541272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Drivers' comprehension of traffic information on graphical route information panels.
    Lai CJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2012 Mar; 45():565-71. PubMed ID: 22269543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pathway HUDs: are they viable?
    Fadden S; Ververs PM; Wickens CD
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(2):173-93. PubMed ID: 11592660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of three helmet-mounted display symbologies on unusual attitude recognition and recovery.
    Ercoline WR; Self BP; Matthews RS
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1053-8. PubMed ID: 12433226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrated displays and the perception of graphical data.
    Goettl BP; Wickens CD; Kramer AF
    Ergonomics; 1991 Aug; 34(8):1047-63. PubMed ID: 1935882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Polychromatic percepts during hypergravity.
    Chelette T; Allnutt R; Tripp L; Esken R; Bolia S; Post D
    J Gravit Physiol; 1999 Jul; 6(1):P13-4. PubMed ID: 11542991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic maps for terminal area navigation: effects of frame of reference and dimensionality.
    Wickens CD; Liang CC; Prevett T; Olmos O
    Int J Aviat Psychol; 1996; 6(3):241-71. PubMed ID: 11540139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Information access in a dual-task context: testing a model of optimal strategy selection.
    Wickens CD; Seidler KS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 1997 Sep; 3(3):196-215. PubMed ID: 11540969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Configural display design techniques considered at multiple levels of evaluation.
    Bennett KB; Walters B
    Hum Factors; 2001; 43(3):415-34. PubMed ID: 11866197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Space, object, and task selection.
    Lachter J; Remington RW; Ruthruff E
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jul; 71(5):995-1014. PubMed ID: 19525533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of spatial compatibility on integration processes in graph comprehension.
    Huestegge L; Philipp AM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Aug; 73(6):1903-15. PubMed ID: 21678020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Configural displays can improve nutrition-related. decisions: an application of the proximity compatibility principle.
    Marino CJ; Mahan RR
    Hum Factors; 2005; 47(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 15960091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.