These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23764432)

  • 1. An evaluation of stereoacuity (3D vision) in practising surgeons across a range of surgical specialities.
    Biddle M; Hamid S; Ali N
    Surgeon; 2014 Feb; 12(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 23764432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of age on adult stereoacuity as measured by different types of stereotest.
    Garnham L; Sloper JJ
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2006 Jan; 90(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 16361675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manufacturer changes lead to clinically important differences between two editions of the TNO stereotest.
    van Doorn LL; Evans BJ; Edgar DF; Fortuin MF
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Mar; 34(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 24355036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maximum angle of horizontal strabismus consistent with true stereopsis.
    Leske DA; Holmes JM
    J AAPOS; 2004 Feb; 8(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 14970796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An investigation of the difference in stereoacuity between crossed and uncrossed disparities using Frisby and TNO tests.
    Larson WL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar; 67(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 2320359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of factors influencing distance stereoacuity on Frisby-Davis Distance Test (FD2) in intermittent exotropia.
    Saxena R; Kakkar A; Menon V; Sharma P; Phuljhele S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Aug; 95(8):1098-101. PubMed ID: 20935306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Study on the near, middle and long distance stereopsis of normal and children with intermittent exotropia].
    Hu C; Huang X; Liu G; Li H; Yang X; Han B
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Aug; 38(8):452-6. PubMed ID: 12410980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative analysis of the Lang Stereopad in a non-clinic population.
    Rowe FJ; Hepworth LR; Howard C; Chean CS; Mistry M
    Strabismus; 2019 Sep; 27(3):182-190. PubMed ID: 31329020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Normative Values for Near and Distance Clinical Tests of Stereoacuity.
    Piano ME; Tidbury LP; O'Connor AR
    Strabismus; 2016 Dec; 24(4):169-172. PubMed ID: 27929725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of FD2 (Frisby Davis distance) stereotest in surgical management of intermittent exotropia.
    Singh A; Sharma P; Singh D; Saxena R; Sharma A; Menon V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 97(10):1318-21. PubMed ID: 23902676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validity of the Titmus and Randot circles tasks in children with known binocular vision disorders.
    Fawcett SL; Birch EE
    J AAPOS; 2003 Oct; 7(5):333-8. PubMed ID: 14566315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical Assessment of Stereoacuity and 3-D Stereoscopic Entertainment.
    Tidbury LP; Black RH; O'Connor AR
    Strabismus; 2015; 23(4):164-9. PubMed ID: 26669421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of static and dynamic stereoacuity.
    Zinn WJ; Solomon H
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):712-5. PubMed ID: 4056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Stereoacuity norms for school-age children using the Frisby stereotest.
    Anketell PM; Saunders KJ; Little JA
    J AAPOS; 2013 Dec; 17(6):582-7. PubMed ID: 24321423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective study of binocular visual function before and after successful surgery to remove a unilateral epiretinal membrane.
    Asaria R; Garnham L; Gregor ZJ; Sloper JJ
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Nov; 115(11):1930-7. PubMed ID: 18722667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of TNO red-green glasses on local stereoacuity.
    Larson WL
    Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1988 Dec; 65(12):946-50. PubMed ID: 3223509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of stereoacuity with a digital mobile application.
    Bonfanti S; Gargantini A; Esposito G; Facchin A; Maffioletti M; Maffioletti S
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2021 Sep; 259(9):2843-2848. PubMed ID: 33907883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of the Effect of Different Types of Experimental Anisometropia on Stereopsis Measured with Titmus, Randot and TNO Stereotests.
    Nabie R; Andalib D; Khojasteh H; Aslanzadeh SA
    J Ophthalmic Vis Res; 2019; 14(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 30820287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of depth perception and association of severity in Glaucoma patients and suspects.
    Adhikari PG; Thapa M; Dahal M
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):432. PubMed ID: 34911486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors influencing stereoacuity outcomes in adults with acquired strabismus.
    Fawcett SL; Stager DR; Felius J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Dec; 138(6):931-5. PubMed ID: 15629283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.