368 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23764606)
1. Impact of humic acid fouling on membrane performance and transport of pharmaceutically active compounds in forward osmosis.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4567-75. PubMed ID: 23764606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relating reverse and forward solute diffusion to membrane fouling in osmotically driven membrane processes.
She Q; Jin X; Li Q; Tang CY
Water Res; 2012 May; 46(7):2478-86. PubMed ID: 22386887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of fouling on separation performance by forward osmosis: the role of specific organic foulants.
Zheng L; Price WE; Nghiem LD
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Nov; 26(33):33758-33769. PubMed ID: 29766436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fatty acid fouling of forward osmosis membrane: Effects of pH, calcium, membrane orientation, initial permeate flux and foulant composition.
Zhao P; Gao B; Yue Q; Liu P; Shon HK
J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Aug; 46():55-62. PubMed ID: 27521936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trace organic solutes in closed-loop forward osmosis applications: influence of membrane fouling and modeling of solute build-up.
D'Haese A; Le-Clech P; Van Nevel S; Verbeken K; Cornelissen ER; Khan SJ; Verliefde AR
Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(14):5232-44. PubMed ID: 23866149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relating rejection of trace organic contaminants to membrane properties in forward osmosis: measurements, modelling and implications.
Xie M; Nghiem LD; Price WE; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2014 Feb; 49():265-74. PubMed ID: 24345822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flux patterns and membrane fouling propensity during desalination of seawater by forward osmosis.
Li ZY; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Valladares-Linares R; Li Q; Zhan T; Amy G
Water Res; 2012 Jan; 46(1):195-204. PubMed ID: 22094000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying the rejection mechanism for nanofiltration membranes fouled by humic acid and calcium ions exemplified by acetaminophen, sulfamethoxazole, and triclosan.
Chang EE; Chang YC; Liang CH; Huang CP; Chiang PC
J Hazard Mater; 2012 Jun; 221-222():19-27. PubMed ID: 22554383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characteristics of organic fouling, reversibility by physical cleaning and concentrates in forward osmosis membrane processes for wastewater reclamation.
Jung J; Ryu J; Yu Y; Kweon J
Chemosphere; 2020 Apr; 245():125787. PubMed ID: 31959357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Synthesis and characterization of novel forward osmosis membranes based on layer-by-layer assembly.
Saren Q; Qiu CQ; Tang CY
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jun; 45(12):5201-8. PubMed ID: 21591607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined organic-inorganic fouling of forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes.
Arkhangelsky E; Wicaksana F; Tang C; Al-Rabiah AA; Al-Zahrani SM; Wang R
Water Res; 2012 Dec; 46(19):6329-38. PubMed ID: 23026125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hydrophilic, bactericidal nanoheater-enabled reverse osmosis membranes to improve fouling resistance.
Ray JR; Tadepalli S; Nergiz SZ; Liu KK; You L; Tang Y; Singamaneni S; Jun YS
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2015 Jun; 7(21):11117-26. PubMed ID: 25941970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study.
Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Organic fouling of thin-film composite polyamide and cellulose triacetate forward osmosis membranes by oppositely charged macromolecules.
Gu Y; Wang YN; Wei J; Tang CY
Water Res; 2013 Apr; 47(5):1867-74. PubMed ID: 23384517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characterising humic acid fouling of nanofiltration membranes using bisphenol A as a molecular indicator.
Nghiem LD; Vogel D; Khan S
Water Res; 2008 Sep; 42(15):4049-58. PubMed ID: 18678386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combined coagulation-disk filtration process as a pretreatment of ultrafiltration and reverse osmosis membrane for wastewater reclamation: an autopsy study of a pilot plant.
Chon K; Kim SJ; Moon J; Cho J
Water Res; 2012 Apr; 46(6):1803-16. PubMed ID: 22310806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Direct microscopic observation of forward osmosis membrane fouling.
Wang Y; Wicaksana F; Tang CY; Fane AG
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Sep; 44(18):7102-9. PubMed ID: 20735033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of water matrix on the rejection of neutral pharmaceutically active compound by thin-film composite nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Shah IA; Ali S; Yang Z; Ihsanullah I; Huang H
Chemosphere; 2022 Sep; 303(Pt 3):135211. PubMed ID: 35660049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of silica fouling on the removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Lin YL; Chiou JH; Lee CH
J Hazard Mater; 2014 Jul; 277():102-9. PubMed ID: 24560524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
