These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23764609)

  • 1. Applying global sensitivity analysis to the modelling of flow and water quality in sewers.
    Gamerith V; Neumann MB; Muschalla D
    Water Res; 2013 Sep; 47(13):4600-11. PubMed ID: 23764609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different uncertainty techniques in urban stormwater quantity and quality modelling.
    Dotto CB; Mannina G; Kleidorfer M; Vezzaro L; Henrichs M; McCarthy DT; Freni G; Rauch W; Deletic A
    Water Res; 2012 May; 46(8):2545-58. PubMed ID: 22402270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of rainfall temporal resolution on urban water quality modelling performance and uncertainties.
    Manz BJ; Rodríguez JP; Maksimović C; McIntyre N
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 23823541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Global sensitivity analysis of the BSM2 dynamic influent disturbance scenario generator.
    Flores-Alsina X; Gernaey KV; Jeppsson U
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(11):1912-22. PubMed ID: 22592459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of rainfall time resolution for urban water quality modelling.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(9):2381-90. PubMed ID: 20418636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Probabilistic modelling of overflow, surcharge and flooding in urban drainage using the first-order reliability method and parameterization of local rain series.
    Thorndahl S; Willems P
    Water Res; 2008 Jan; 42(1-2):455-66. PubMed ID: 17719076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncertainty analysis in urban drainage modelling: should we break our back for normally distributed residuals?
    Dotto CB; Deletic A; McCarthy DT
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(6):1271-9. PubMed ID: 24056423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison between InfoWorks hydraulic results and a physical model of an urban drainage system.
    Rubinato M; Shucksmith J; Saul AJ; Shepherd W
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(2):372-9. PubMed ID: 23863430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Receiving water quality assessment: comparison between simplified and detailed integrated urban modelling approaches.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(10):2301-12. PubMed ID: 21076216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. One-dimensional modelling of the interactions between heavy rainfall-runoff in an urban area and flooding flows from sewer networks and rivers.
    Kouyi GL; Fraisse D; Rivière N; Guinot V; Chocat B
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(4):927-34. PubMed ID: 19700831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of parameter uncertainty of a flow and quality stormwater model.
    Dotto CB; Deletic A; Fletcher TD
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):717-25. PubMed ID: 19657167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. GIS-based applications of sensitivity analysis for sewer models.
    Mair M; Sitzenfrei R; Kleidorfer M; Möderl M; Rauch W
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(7):1215-22. PubMed ID: 22437018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physically-based urban stormwater quality modelling: An efficient approach for calibration and sensitivity analysis.
    Hong Y; Liao Q; Bonhomme C; Chebbo G
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():462-471. PubMed ID: 31200180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Real-time forecasting urban drainage models: full or simplified networks?
    Leitão JP; Simões NE; Maksimović C; Ferreira F; Prodanović D; Matos JS; Sá Marques A
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 62(9):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21045338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cluster analysis for characterization of rainfalls and CSO behaviours in an urban drainage area of Tokyo.
    Yu Y; Kojima K; An K; Furumai H
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(3):544-51. PubMed ID: 23925181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of runoff from various urban catchments at different spatial scales in Beijing, China.
    Zhang W; Che W; Liu DK; Gan YP; Lv FF
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 22678196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Probabilistic modelling of combined sewer overflow using the First Order Reliability Method.
    Thorndahl S; Schaarup-Jensen K; Jensen JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(9):1337-44. PubMed ID: 18495996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Urban drainage models--simplifying uncertainty analysis for practitioners.
    Vezzaro L; Mikkelsen PS; Deletic A; McCarthy D
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(10):2136-43. PubMed ID: 24292459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Separate and combined sewer systems: a long-term modelling approach.
    Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(3):555-65. PubMed ID: 19657150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Local effects of global climate change on the urban drainage system of Hamburg.
    Krieger K; Kuchenbecker A; Hüffmeyer N; Verworn HR
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(5):1107-13. PubMed ID: 24037163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.