These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23765315)

  • 1. Impact of international variation of prostate cancer on a predictive nomogram for biochemical recurrence in clinically localised prostate cancer.
    Cho YM; Jung SJ; Cho N; Kim MJ; Kattan MW; Yu C; Ahn H; Ro JY;
    World J Urol; 2014 Apr; 32(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 23765315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Brockman JA; Alanee S; Vickers AJ; Scardino PT; Wood DP; Kibel AS; Lin DW; Bianco FJ; Rabah DM; Klein EA; Ciezki JP; Gao T; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ
    Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 25301759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pre- and post-operative nomograms to predict recurrence-free probability in korean men with clinically localized prostate cancer.
    Kang M; Jeong CW; Choi WS; Park YH; Cho SY; Lee S; Lee SB; Ku JH; Hong SK; Byun SS; Jeong H; Kwak C; Kim HH; Lee E; Lee SE;
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(6):e100053. PubMed ID: 24936784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-cultural validation of a prognostic tool: example of the Kattan preoperative nomogram as a predictor of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Rouprêt M; Hupertan V; Comperat E; Drouin SJ; Phé V; Xylinas E; Demanse D; Sibony M; Richard F; Cussenot O
    BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(6):813-7; discussion 817-8. PubMed ID: 19254280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A validation of two preoperative nomograms predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy in a cohort of European men.
    Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
    Urol Oncol; 2002; 7(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 12474529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
    Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predicting survival of men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
    Dell'Oglio P; Suardi N; Boorjian SA; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Tian Z; Moschini M; Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
    Eur J Cancer; 2016 Feb; 54():27-34. PubMed ID: 26707594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence.
    Lee BH; Kibel AS; Ciezki JP; Klein EA; Reddy CA; Yu C; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ
    Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 25294696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do nomograms designed to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) do a better job of predicting more clinically relevant prostate cancer outcomes than BCR? A report from the SEARCH database group.
    Teeter AE; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
    Urology; 2013 Jul; 82(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 23806388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How far is the preoperative Kattan nomogram applicable for the prediction of recurrence after prostatectomy in patients presenting with PSA levels of more than 20 ng/ml? A validation study.
    May M; Gunia S; Helke C; Führer S; Hoschke B; Fahlenkamp D; Vogler H; Siegsmund M
    Urol Int; 2006; 77(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 17033209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. External validation of preoperative nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
    Tanaka A; Ohori M; Paul L; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Tachibana M
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 43(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 24146147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive factors associated with biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy for pathological T2 prostate cancer with negative surgical margins.
    Aoun F; Albisinni S; Henriet B; Tombal B; Van Velthoven R; Roumeguère T
    Scand J Urol; 2017 Feb; 51(1):20-26. PubMed ID: 27910728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contemporary approach to predict early biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: update of the Walz nomogram.
    Pompe RS; Bandini M; Preisser F; Marchioni M; Zaffuto E; Tian Z; Salomon G; Schlomm T; Huland H; Graefen M; Tilki D; Shariat SF; Karakiewicz PI
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Sep; 21(3):386-393. PubMed ID: 29487397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the Optimal Timing for Early Salvage Radiation Therapy in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen Rise After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Fossati N; Karnes RJ; Cozzarini C; Fiorino C; Gandaglia G; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Goldner G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T; Briganti A
    Eur Urol; 2016 Apr; 69(4):728-733. PubMed ID: 26497924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
    Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
    BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Postoperative prostate-specific antigen nadir improves accuracy for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) and Duke Prostate Center databases.
    Moreira DM; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Sun LL; Moul JW; Freedland SJ
    Int J Urol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):914-22. PubMed ID: 20880361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tertiary Gleason pattern in radical prostatectomy specimens is associated with worse outcomes than the next higher Gleason score group in localized prostate cancer.
    Özsoy M; D'Andrea D; Moschini M; Foerster B; Abufaraj M; Mathieu R; Briganti A; Karakiewicz PI; Roupret M; Seitz C; Czech AK; Susani M; Shariat SF
    Urol Oncol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):158.e1-158.e6. PubMed ID: 29288003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. No impact of blood transfusion on oncological outcome after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.
    Boehm K; Beyer B; Tennstedt P; Schiffmann J; Budaeus L; Haese A; Graefen M; Schlomm T; Heinzer H; Salomon G
    World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 24989847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. External validation of the Briganti nomogram to estimate the probability of specimen-confined disease in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.
    Roumiguié M; Beauval JB; Filleron T; Benoit T; Rischmann P; de la Taille A; Salomon L; Soulié M; Malavaud B; Ploussard G
    BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E113-E119. PubMed ID: 24684584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CPC Risk Calculator: A New App to Predict Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence During Follow-up After Radical Prostatectomy.
    Røder MA; Berg KD; Loft MD; Thomsen FB; Ferrari M; Kurbegovic S; Rytgaard HC; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Gerds TA; Kjær A; Brooks JD; Iversen P
    Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28753827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.