288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23765473)
1. Science prizes: The new Nobels.
Merali Z
Nature; 2013 Jun; 498(7453):152-4. PubMed ID: 23765473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mega science prize split between 1,377 physicists.
Merali Z
Nature; 2015 Nov; 527(7577):145. PubMed ID: 26560277
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Determinants factors of Spanish researchers mobility in Health Sciences].
Aceituno-Aceituno P; Romero-Martínez SJ; Victor-Ponce P; García-Nuñez J
Med Clin (Barc); 2015 Jun; 144(11):520-4. PubMed ID: 25577584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Measuring revolutionary biomedical science 1992-2006 using Nobel prizes, Lasker (clinical medicine) awards and Gairdner awards (NLG metric).
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 69(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17276606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Science funding: Duel to the death.
Bhattacharya A
Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):20-2. PubMed ID: 22859184
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rapid rise of a research nation.
Zhou Y
Nature; 2015 Dec; 528(7582):S170-3. PubMed ID: 26673023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Nothing to fear from mistakes.
't Hooft G
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S7. PubMed ID: 20944622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science prizes: Time-lapsed awards for excellence.
Chan HF; Torgler B
Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7460):29. PubMed ID: 23903739
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific prize network predicts who pushes the boundaries of science.
Ma Y; Uzzi B
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 Dec; 115(50):12608-12615. PubMed ID: 30530666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Science prizes: Best in class.
Powell K
Nature; 2008 Sep; 455(7212):455-8. PubMed ID: 18818627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Perspective: Give youth a chance.
Wang CC
Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S36. PubMed ID: 25924199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Don't pay prizes for published science.
Nature; 2017 Jul; 547(7662):137. PubMed ID: 28703211
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientometric identification of elite 'revolutionary science' research institutions by analysis of trends in Nobel prizes 1947-2006.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 68(5):931-4. PubMed ID: 17234352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Star quality.
Cyranoski D
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6972):282-3. PubMed ID: 14737138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Why there should be more science Nobel prizes and laureates - And why proportionate credit should be awarded to institutions.
Charlton BG
Med Hypotheses; 2007; 68(3):471-3. PubMed ID: 17127013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Science brick by brick.
Smithies O
Nature; 2010 Oct; 467(7317):S6. PubMed ID: 20944621
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell mates.
Ruttimann J
Nature; 2007 Nov; 450(7170):756-7. PubMed ID: 18172934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Coming home.
Mayor S
Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):488-9. PubMed ID: 16049474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Too intelligent for the life sciences in Brazil: how two female researchers fought back.
Leite L; Diele-Viegas LM
Nature; 2020 Nov; 587(7832):163-164. PubMed ID: 33087869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Women who win prizes get less money and prestige.
Ma Y; Oliveira DFM; Woodruff TK; Uzzi B
Nature; 2019 Jan; 565(7739):287-288. PubMed ID: 30651627
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
