These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23765541)

  • 1. Impact of immediate access to the electronic medical record on anatomic pathology performance.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Jul; 140(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 23765541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Increasing agreement over time in interlaboratory anatomic pathology consultation material.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2013 Aug; 140(2):215-8. PubMed ID: 23897257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the electronic medical record to better define "no products of conception" as a critical value in anatomic pathology.
    Renshaw A
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jan; 137(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 22180485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of interinstitution anatomic pathology consultation on patient care.
    Abt AB; Abt LG; Olt GJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 119(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 7605166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality assurance measures for critical diagnoses in anatomic pathology.
    Renshaw A; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Mar; 137(3):466-9. PubMed ID: 22338060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.
    Manion E; Cohen MB; Weydert J
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 May; 32(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 18360282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Establishment of an electronic medical record in a psychiatric hospital: evolution of professionals' perceptions].
    Boyer L; Renaud MH; Baumstarck-Barrau K; Fieschi M; Samuelian JC
    Encephale; 2010 Jun; 36(3):236-41. PubMed ID: 20620266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandatory second opinion surgical pathology at a large referral hospital.
    Kronz JD; Westra WH; Epstein JI
    Cancer; 1999 Dec; 86(11):2426-35. PubMed ID: 10590387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent trends in quality, patient safety, and error reduction in nongyn cytology.
    Silverman JF
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2010 Nov; 17(6):437-44. PubMed ID: 20966649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual slide telepathology for an academic teaching hospital surgical pathology quality assurance program.
    Graham AR; Bhattacharyya AK; Scott KM; Lian F; Grasso LL; Richter LC; Carpenter JB; Chiang S; Henderson JT; Lopez AM; Barker GP; Weinstein RS
    Hum Pathol; 2009 Aug; 40(8):1129-36. PubMed ID: 19540562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
    Silverman JF;
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Jun; 125(6):815-7. PubMed ID: 16690478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Quantifying the value of in-house consultation in surgical pathology.
    Renshaw AA; Pinnar NE; Jiroutek MR; Young ML
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 May; 117(5):751-4. PubMed ID: 12090424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hospices' use of electronic medical records for quality assessment and performance improvement programs.
    Zheng NT; Rokoske FS; Kirk MA; Lyda-McDonald B; Bernard SL
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2014 Oct; 48(4):582-9. PubMed ID: 24636959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
    Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2006 Jul; 30(7):897-9. PubMed ID: 16819334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critical diagnoses (critical values) in anatomic pathology.
    ; Silverman JF; Fletcher CD; Frable WJ; Goldblum JR; Pereira TC; Swanson PE
    Hum Pathol; 2006 Aug; 37(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 16867859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance of anatomic pathology diagnoses: Comparison of alternate approaches.
    Layfield LJ; Frazier SR
    Pathol Res Pract; 2017 Feb; 213(2):126-129. PubMed ID: 28040330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical impact and frequency of anatomic pathology errors in cancer diagnoses.
    Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Janosky JE; Zarbo RJ; Meier FA; Jensen C; Geyer SJ
    Cancer; 2005 Nov; 104(10):2205-13. PubMed ID: 16216029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surgical pathology sign-out. Routine review of every case by a second pathologist.
    Safrin RE; Bark CJ
    Am J Surg Pathol; 1993 Nov; 17(11):1190-2. PubMed ID: 8214266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Compliance of reviewing portal images on radiographic film vs an electronic medical record.
    Chen GG; Hammoud A; Komajda M; Konski A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Jul; 9(7):495-7. PubMed ID: 22748791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Core components of a comprehensive quality assurance program in anatomic pathology.
    Nakhleh RE
    Adv Anat Pathol; 2009 Nov; 16(6):418-23. PubMed ID: 19851132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.