161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23766067)
1. Effect of provider and patient reminders, deployment of nurse practitioners, and financial incentives on cervical and breast cancer screening rates.
Kaczorowski J; Hearps SJ; Lohfeld L; Goeree R; Donald F; Burgess K; Sebaldt RJ
Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jun; 59(6):e282-9. PubMed ID: 23766067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pay-for-performance incentives for preventive care: views of family physicians before and after participation in a reminder and recall project (P-PROMPT).
Kaczorowski J; Goldberg O; Mai V
Can Fam Physician; 2011 Jun; 57(6):690-6. PubMed ID: 21673219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of payment incentives on cancer screening in Ontario primary care.
Kiran T; Wilton AS; Moineddin R; Paszat L; Glazier RH
Ann Fam Med; 2014 Jul; 12(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 25024239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Financial Incentives and Cervical Cancer Screening Participation in Ontario's Primary Care Practice Models.
Pendrith C; Thind A; Zaric GS; Sarma S
Healthc Policy; 2016 Aug; 12(1):116-28. PubMed ID: 27585031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of financial incentives on breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening delivery rates: Results from a systematic literature review.
Mauro M; Rotundo G; Giancotti M
Health Policy; 2019 Dec; 123(12):1210-1220. PubMed ID: 31587819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-centered medical home implementation and use of preventive services: the role of practice socioeconomic context.
Markovitz AR; Alexander JA; Lantz PM; Paustian ML
JAMA Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 175(4):598-606. PubMed ID: 25686468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's views on reminder letters for screening mammography: Mixed methods study of women from 23 family health networks.
Kaczorowski J; Karwalajtys T; Lohfeld L; Laryea S; Anderson K; Roder S; Sebaldt RJ
Can Fam Physician; 2009 Jun; 55(6):622-3.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19509209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of adding Pap smear information to a mammography reminder system in an HMO: results of randomized controlled trial.
Burack RC; Gimotty PA; Simon M; Moncrease A; Dews P
Prev Med; 2003 May; 36(5):547-54. PubMed ID: 12689799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of financial productivity incentives on the use of preventive care.
Wee CC; Phillips RS; Burstin HR; Cook EF; Puopolo AL; Brennan TA; Haas JS
Am J Med; 2001 Feb; 110(3):181-7. PubMed ID: 11182103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contextual factors associated with uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening: A systematic review of the literature.
Plourde N; Brown HK; Vigod S; Cobigo V
Women Health; 2016; 56(8):906-25. PubMed ID: 26812962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inadequate Systems to Support Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening in Primary Care Practice.
Schapira MM; Sprague BL; Klabunde CN; Tosteson AN; Bitton A; Chen JS; Beaber EF; Onega T; MacLean CD; Harris K; Howe K; Pearson L; Feldman S; Brawarsky P; Haas JS;
J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Oct; 31(10):1148-55. PubMed ID: 27251058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Association between health insurance coverage of office visit and cancer screening among women.
Friedman C; Ahmed F; Franks A; Weatherup T; Manning M; Vance A; Thompson BL
Med Care; 2002 Nov; 40(11):1060-7. PubMed ID: 12409851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening at any cost?
Ladouceur R
Can Fam Physician; 2013 Jun; 59(6):602. PubMed ID: 23766032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Racial differences in cancer screening with electronic health records and electronic preventive care reminders.
Mishuris RG; Linder JA
J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2014 Oct; 21(e2):e264-9. PubMed ID: 24637955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Get screened: a randomized trial of the incremental benefits of reminders, recall, and outreach on cancer screening.
Fortuna RJ; Idris A; Winters P; Humiston SG; Scofield S; Hendren S; Ford P; Li SX; Fiscella K
J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Jan; 29(1):90-7. PubMed ID: 24002626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Design and evaluation of a theory-based, culturally relevant outreach model for breast and cervical cancer screening for Latina immigrants.
White K; Garces IC; Bandura L; McGuire AA; Scarinci IC
Ethn Dis; 2012; 22(3):274-80. PubMed ID: 22870569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implementation and process evaluation of three interventions to promote screening mammograms delivered for 4 years in a large primary care population.
Luckmann R; White MJ; Costanza ME; Frisard CF; Cranos C; Sama S; Yood R
Transl Behav Med; 2017 Sep; 7(3):547-556. PubMed ID: 28452044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors in quality care--the case of follow-up to abnormal cancer screening tests--problems in the steps and interfaces of care.
Zapka J; Taplin SH; Price RA; Cranos C; Yabroff R
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2010; 2010(40):58-71. PubMed ID: 20386054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intervention to increase recommendation and delivery of screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers by healthcare providers a systematic review of provider reminders.
Baron RC; Melillo S; Rimer BK; Coates RJ; Kerner J; Habarta N; Chattopadhyay S; Sabatino SA; Elder R; Leeks KJ;
Am J Prev Med; 2010 Jan; 38(1):110-7. PubMed ID: 20117566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Women's Behaviors Toward Mammogram and Pap Test: Opportunities to Increase Cervical Cancer Screening Participation Rates among Older Women.
Tavasoli SM; Kane E; Chiarelli AM; Kupets R
Womens Health Issues; 2018; 28(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 29174212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
