287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23766071)
1. Accurately identifying low-allelic fraction variants in single samples with next-generation sequencing: applications in tumor subclone resolution.
Stead LF; Sutton KM; Taylor GR; Quirke P; Rabbitts P
Hum Mutat; 2013 Oct; 34(10):1432-8. PubMed ID: 23766071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A method to reduce ancestry related germline false positives in tumor only somatic variant calling.
Halperin RF; Carpten JD; Manojlovic Z; Aldrich J; Keats J; Byron S; Liang WS; Russell M; Enriquez D; Claasen A; Cherni I; Awuah B; Oppong J; Wicha MS; Newman LA; Jaigge E; Kim S; Craig DW
BMC Med Genomics; 2017 Oct; 10(1):61. PubMed ID: 29052513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LoLoPicker: detecting low allelic-fraction variants from low-quality cancer samples.
Carrot-Zhang J; Majewski J
Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(23):37032-37040. PubMed ID: 28416765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. RareVar: A Framework for Detecting Low-Frequency Single-Nucleotide Variants.
Hao Y; Xuei X; Li L; Nakshatri H; Edenberg HJ; Liu Y
J Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):637-646. PubMed ID: 28541743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data.
Xiang X; Lu B; Song D; Li J; Shu K; Pu D
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20444. PubMed ID: 37993475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Panels and Platforms for Detection and Verification of Somatic Tumor Variants for Clinical Diagnostics.
Misyura M; Zhang T; Sukhai MA; Thomas M; Garg S; Kamel-Reid S; Stockley TL
J Mol Diagn; 2016 Nov; 18(6):842-850. PubMed ID: 27770852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing.
Ura H; Togi S; Niida Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 32429412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. VarDict: a novel and versatile variant caller for next-generation sequencing in cancer research.
Lai Z; Markovets A; Ahdesmaki M; Chapman B; Hofmann O; McEwen R; Johnson J; Dougherty B; Barrett JC; Dry JR
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jun; 44(11):e108. PubMed ID: 27060149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. mirTrios: an integrated pipeline for detection of de novo and rare inherited mutations from trios-based next-generation sequencing.
Li J; Jiang Y; Wang T; Chen H; Xie Q; Shao Q; Ran X; Xia K; Sun ZS; Wu J
J Med Genet; 2015 Apr; 52(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25596308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large-scale detection of rare variants via pooled multiplexed next-generation sequencing: towards next-generation Ecotilling.
Marroni F; Pinosio S; Di Centa E; Jurman I; Boerjan W; Felice N; Cattonaro F; Morgante M
Plant J; 2011 Aug; 67(4):736-45. PubMed ID: 21554453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrated next-generation sequencing analysis of whole exome and 409 cancer-related genes.
Shimoda Y; Nagashima T; Urakami K; Tanabe T; Saito J; Naruoka A; Serizawa M; Mochizuki T; Ohshima K; Ohnami S; Ohnami S; Kusuhara M; Yamaguchi K
Biomed Res; 2016; 37(6):367-379. PubMed ID: 28003584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes.
Singh RR; Patel KP; Routbort MJ; Reddy NG; Barkoh BA; Handal B; Kanagal-Shamanna R; Greaves WO; Medeiros LJ; Aldape KD; Luthra R
J Mol Diagn; 2013 Sep; 15(5):607-22. PubMed ID: 23810757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating Variant Calling Tools for Non-Matched Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Sandmann S; de Graaf AO; Karimi M; van der Reijden BA; Hellström-Lindberg E; Jansen JH; Dugas M
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43169. PubMed ID: 28233799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. OutLyzer: software for extracting low-allele-frequency tumor mutations from sequencing background noise in clinical practice.
Muller E; Goardon N; Brault B; Rousselin A; Paimparay G; Legros A; Fouillet R; Bruet O; Tranchant A; Domin F; San C; Quesnelle C; Frebourg T; Ricou A; Krieger S; Vaur D; Castera L
Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(48):79485-79493. PubMed ID: 27825131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cancer cell-line titration series for evaluating somatic classification.
Denroche RE; Mullen L; Timms L; Beck T; Yung CK; Stein L; McPherson JD; Brown AM
BMC Res Notes; 2015 Dec; 8():823. PubMed ID: 26708082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
