These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23766071)

  • 1. Accurately identifying low-allelic fraction variants in single samples with next-generation sequencing: applications in tumor subclone resolution.
    Stead LF; Sutton KM; Taylor GR; Quirke P; Rabbitts P
    Hum Mutat; 2013 Oct; 34(10):1432-8. PubMed ID: 23766071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
    Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method to reduce ancestry related germline false positives in tumor only somatic variant calling.
    Halperin RF; Carpten JD; Manojlovic Z; Aldrich J; Keats J; Byron S; Liang WS; Russell M; Enriquez D; Claasen A; Cherni I; Awuah B; Oppong J; Wicha MS; Newman LA; Jaigge E; Kim S; Craig DW
    BMC Med Genomics; 2017 Oct; 10(1):61. PubMed ID: 29052513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
    Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LoLoPicker: detecting low allelic-fraction variants from low-quality cancer samples.
    Carrot-Zhang J; Majewski J
    Oncotarget; 2017 Jun; 8(23):37032-37040. PubMed ID: 28416765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RareVar: A Framework for Detecting Low-Frequency Single-Nucleotide Variants.
    Hao Y; Xuei X; Li L; Nakshatri H; Edenberg HJ; Liu Y
    J Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 24(7):637-646. PubMed ID: 28541743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A computational approach to distinguish somatic vs. germline origin of genomic alterations from deep sequencing of cancer specimens without a matched normal.
    Sun JX; He Y; Sanford E; Montesion M; Frampton GM; Vignot S; Soria JC; Ross JS; Miller VA; Stephens PJ; Lipson D; Yelensky R
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 Feb; 14(2):e1005965. PubMed ID: 29415044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating the performance of low-frequency variant calling tools for the detection of variants from short-read deep sequencing data.
    Xiang X; Lu B; Song D; Li J; Shu K; Pu D
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20444. PubMed ID: 37993475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Panels and Platforms for Detection and Verification of Somatic Tumor Variants for Clinical Diagnostics.
    Misyura M; Zhang T; Sukhai MA; Thomas M; Garg S; Kamel-Reid S; Stockley TL
    J Mol Diagn; 2016 Nov; 18(6):842-850. PubMed ID: 27770852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of somatic variant detection algorithms using Ion Torrent targeted deep sequencing data.
    Wang Q; Kotoula V; Hsu PC; Papadopoulou K; Ho JWK; Fountzilas G; Giannoulatou E
    BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):181. PubMed ID: 31874647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual Deep Sequencing Improves the Accuracy of Low-Frequency Somatic Mutation Detection in Cancer Gene Panel Testing.
    Ura H; Togi S; Niida Y
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 May; 21(10):. PubMed ID: 32429412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. VarDict: a novel and versatile variant caller for next-generation sequencing in cancer research.
    Lai Z; Markovets A; Ahdesmaki M; Chapman B; Hofmann O; McEwen R; Johnson J; Dougherty B; Barrett JC; Dry JR
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jun; 44(11):e108. PubMed ID: 27060149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. mirTrios: an integrated pipeline for detection of de novo and rare inherited mutations from trios-based next-generation sequencing.
    Li J; Jiang Y; Wang T; Chen H; Xie Q; Shao Q; Ran X; Xia K; Sun ZS; Wu J
    J Med Genet; 2015 Apr; 52(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 25596308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Large-scale detection of rare variants via pooled multiplexed next-generation sequencing: towards next-generation Ecotilling.
    Marroni F; Pinosio S; Di Centa E; Jurman I; Boerjan W; Felice N; Cattonaro F; Morgante M
    Plant J; 2011 Aug; 67(4):736-45. PubMed ID: 21554453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Integrated next-generation sequencing analysis of whole exome and 409 cancer-related genes.
    Shimoda Y; Nagashima T; Urakami K; Tanabe T; Saito J; Naruoka A; Serizawa M; Mochizuki T; Ohshima K; Ohnami S; Ohnami S; Kusuhara M; Yamaguchi K
    Biomed Res; 2016; 37(6):367-379. PubMed ID: 28003584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical validation of a next-generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer-related genes.
    Singh RR; Patel KP; Routbort MJ; Reddy NG; Barkoh BA; Handal B; Kanagal-Shamanna R; Greaves WO; Medeiros LJ; Aldape KD; Luthra R
    J Mol Diagn; 2013 Sep; 15(5):607-22. PubMed ID: 23810757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating Variant Calling Tools for Non-Matched Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
    Sandmann S; de Graaf AO; Karimi M; van der Reijden BA; Hellström-Lindberg E; Jansen JH; Dugas M
    Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43169. PubMed ID: 28233799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. OutLyzer: software for extracting low-allele-frequency tumor mutations from sequencing background noise in clinical practice.
    Muller E; Goardon N; Brault B; Rousselin A; Paimparay G; Legros A; Fouillet R; Bruet O; Tranchant A; Domin F; San C; Quesnelle C; Frebourg T; Ricou A; Krieger S; Vaur D; Castera L
    Oncotarget; 2016 Nov; 7(48):79485-79493. PubMed ID: 27825131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detailed simulation of cancer exome sequencing data reveals differences and common limitations of variant callers.
    Hofmann AL; Behr J; Singer J; Kuipers J; Beisel C; Schraml P; Moch H; Beerenwinkel N
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28049408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A cancer cell-line titration series for evaluating somatic classification.
    Denroche RE; Mullen L; Timms L; Beck T; Yung CK; Stein L; McPherson JD; Brown AM
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Dec; 8():823. PubMed ID: 26708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.