These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376617)
1. Say "no" to drug testing. Greenblatt DJ; Shader RI J Clin Psychopharmacol; 1990 Jun; 10(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 2376617 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legal aspects of urine screening. Schroeder EP NIDA Res Monogr; 1989; 95():218-24. PubMed ID: 2640967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Drug screening in the workplace: use, abuse and implications. Grabowski J; Silverman PB NIDA Res Monogr; 1989; 95():225-31. PubMed ID: 2640968 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Some comments on the ethics of hair analysis for drugs. Erin CA Addiction; 1994 Mar; 89(3):299-300. PubMed ID: 8173498 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Punitive versus public health oriented responses to drug use by pregnant women. Schroedel JR; Fiber P Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2001; 1():217-35. PubMed ID: 12669331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Commentary: NIDA's role in applied research. DuPont R; Jaffe J; Kleber H NIDA Res Monogr; 1990; 100():225-39. PubMed ID: 2132773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Drug and alcohol testing in the workplace--objectives, pitfalls, and guidelines. Schottenfeld RS Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse; 1989; 15(4):413-27. PubMed ID: 2688397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mandatory post-accident drug and alcohol testing for the Federal Railroad Administration: a comparison of results for two consecutive years. Moody DE; Crouch DJ; Andrenyak DM; Smith RP; Wilkins DG; Hoffman AM; Rollins DE NIDA Res Monogr; 1990; 100():79-96. PubMed ID: 2132779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston. Barton EF Brooklyn Law Rev; 2001; 67(1):261-92. PubMed ID: 12645550 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Public policy statement on drug testing as a component of addiction treatment and monitoring programs and in other clinical settings. J Addict Dis; 2003; 22(3):114-9. PubMed ID: 14621351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Barbarians at the gates. Gitlow S J Addict Dis; 1993; 12(2):9-21. PubMed ID: 8476946 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Should informed consent be required for laboratory testing for drugs of abuse in medical settings? Warner EA; Walker RM; Friedmann PD Am J Med; 2003 Jul; 115(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 12867235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of a drug testing program in the Navy. Cangianelli LA NIDA Res Monogr; 1989; 95():211-7. PubMed ID: 2640966 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Punitive policies: constitutional hazards of non-consensual testing of women for prenatal drug use. VanRaalte DB Health Matrix Clevel; 1995; 5(2):443-82. PubMed ID: 10152586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Companies mandating drug testing need sites. ED Manag; 1995 Dec; 7(12):139-44. PubMed ID: 10153321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [On-site testing for drug abuse in urine]. Espnes KA; Spigset O; Delaveris GJ; Mørland J; Smith-Kielland A Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Sep; 126(17):2257-60. PubMed ID: 16967064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Criminalization of pregnant substance abusers: a health care perspective. Popovits RM J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jun; 24(6):169-81. PubMed ID: 10170728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Hair analysis for drugs: defining the ethical questions. Almond B Addiction; 1994 Mar; 89(3):296-7. PubMed ID: 8173496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Treating drug-dependent patients in hospitals. Skene L; Keays D; Gardner B J Law Med; 2002 Aug; 10(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 12242876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]