These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23767801)

  • 1. Diagnostic accuracy of a bayesian latent group analysis for the detection of malingering-related poor effort.
    Ortega A; Labrenz S; Markowitsch HJ; Piefke M
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(6):1019-42. PubMed ID: 23767801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in a sample of cognitively impaired patients.
    Ortega A; Piefke M; Markowitsch HJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2014; 36(6):659-67. PubMed ID: 24911397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test.
    Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 39(2):173-189. PubMed ID: 27501116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examining the Test Of Memory Malingering Trial 1 and Word Memory Test Immediate Recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort.
    Bauer L; O'Bryant SE; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ; Fisher JM
    Assessment; 2007 Sep; 14(3):215-22. PubMed ID: 17690378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Albany Consistency Index for the Test of Memory Malingering.
    Gunner JH; Miele AS; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Jan; 27(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22107827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory malingering: evaluating WMT criteria.
    Martins M; Martins IP
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2010 Jul; 17(3):177-82. PubMed ID: 20799108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Bayesian latent group analysis for detecting poor effort in the assessment of malingering.
    Ortega A; Wagenmakers EJ; Lee MD; Markowitsch HJ; Piefke M
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Jun; 27(4):453-65. PubMed ID: 22543568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests.
    Tan JE; Slick DJ; Strauss E; Hultsch DF
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 12822058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): normative data from cognitively intact, cognitively impaired, and elderly patients with dementia.
    Teichner G; Wagner MT
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 15033228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Test of memory malingering and word memory test: a new comparison of failure concordance rates.
    Greiffenstein MF; Greve KW; Bianchini KJ; Baker WJ
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2008; 23(7-8):801-7. PubMed ID: 18783912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury and chronic pain: a comparison of three forced-choice symptom validity tests.
    Greve KW; Ord J; Curtis KL; Bianchini KJ; Brennan A
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2008 Sep; 22(5):896-918. PubMed ID: 18756391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity of the test of memory malingering and the Nonverbal Medical Symptom Validity Test: a replication study.
    Armistead-Jehle P; Gervais RO
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2011 Oct; 18(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 22074067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Trial 1 versus Trial 2 of the Test of Memory Malingering: Evaluating accuracy without a "gold standard".
    Mossman D; Wygant DB; Gervais RO; Hart KJ
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Jan; 30(1):74-85. PubMed ID: 28252976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of all three Test of Memory Malingering trials in establishing the level of effort.
    Wisdom NM; Brown WL; Chen DK; Collins RL
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 27(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 22277125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Visual Association Test-Extended: a cross-sectional study of the performance validity measures.
    Meyer SR; de Jonghe JF; Schmand B; Ponds RW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 May; 31(4):798-813. PubMed ID: 28156190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury.
    Frederick RI; Bowden SC
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The diagnostic accuracy of symptom validity tests when used with postsecondary students with learning disabilities: a preliminary investigation.
    Lindstrom WA; Lindstrom JH; Coleman C; Nelson J; Gregg N
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Nov; 24(7):659-69. PubMed ID: 19778916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of distraction on the Word Memory Test and Test of Memory Malingering performance in patients with a severe brain injury.
    Batt K; Shores EA; Chekaluk E
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2008 Nov; 14(6):1074-80. PubMed ID: 18954488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit.
    Grabyan JM; Collins RL; Alverson WA; Chen DK
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 32(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 28826306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hit rates of adequate performance based on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) Trial 1.
    Gavett BE; O'Bryant SE; Fisher JM; McCaffrey RJ
    Appl Neuropsychol; 2005; 12(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 15788216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.