215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23767820)
1. Flat fold and cup-shaped N95 filtering facepiece respirator face seal area and pressure determinations: a stereophotogrammetry study.
Niezgoda G; Kim JH; Roberge RJ; Benson SM
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2013; 10(8):419-24. PubMed ID: 23767820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact on quantitative fit-test results after application of prophylactic hydrocolloid dressing under N95 respirators.
Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Sage S; Segal R; Williams DL
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2022 Aug; 43(8):993-996. PubMed ID: 34269165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparing mask fit and usability of traditional and nanofibre N95 filtering facepiece respirators before and after nursing procedures.
Suen LKP; Guo YP; Ho SSK; Au-Yeung CH; Lam SC
J Hosp Infect; 2020 Mar; 104(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 31545991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physiologic and fit factor profiles of N95 and P100 filtering facepiece respirators for use in hot, humid environments.
Kim JH; Wu T; Powell JB; Roberge RJ
Am J Infect Control; 2016 Feb; 44(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 26476496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fit evaluation of NIOSH approved N95 filtering facepiece respirators with various skin protectants: A pilot study.
Bergman MS; Grinshpun SA; Yermakov MV; Zhuang Z; Vollmer BE; Yoon KN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Sep; 20(9):365-372. PubMed ID: 37319423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Health care workers and respiratory protection: is the user seal check a surrogate for respirator fit-testing?
Danyluk Q; Hon CY; Neudorf M; Yassi A; Bryce E; Janssen B; Astrakianakis G
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 May; 8(5):267-70. PubMed ID: 21462067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of performance of three different types of respiratory protection devices.
Lawrence RB; Duling MG; Calvert CA; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Sep; 3(9):465-74. PubMed ID: 16857645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Effect on Fit of Multiple Consecutive Donning and Doffing of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
Vuma CD; Manganyi J; Wilson K; Rees D
Ann Work Expo Health; 2019 Oct; 63(8):930-936. PubMed ID: 31504129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized crossover study comparing quantitative fit tests between Trident™ and 3M™ Aura™ N95/P2 respirators.
Williams DL; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas C; Ng I
Infect Dis Health; 2022 May; 27(2):61-65. PubMed ID: 34799300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. N95 respirators: quantitative fit test pass rates and usability and comfort assessment by health care workers.
Ng I; Kave B; Begg F; Bodas CR; Segal R; Williams D
Med J Aust; 2022 Jul; 217(2):88-93. PubMed ID: 35645035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Protective performance and subjective evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators].
Jiang LM; Yu YY; Rong Y; Cui XQ; Wang XY; Lu W; Tao Y; Chen WH
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 31(9):649-53. PubMed ID: 24064118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Personalized 3D-printed frames to reduce leak from N95 filtering facepiece respirators: A prospective crossover trial in health care workers.
Chapman D; Strong C; Ullah S; Richards L; Ganesan AN
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2023 Jul; 20(7):304-314. PubMed ID: 37084394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Nanoparticle penetration through filter media and leakage through face seal interface of N95 filtering facepiece respirators.
Rengasamy S; Eimer BC
Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Jul; 56(5):568-80. PubMed ID: 22294504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the benefit of the user seal check on N95 filtering facepiece respirator fit.
Viscusi DJ; Bergman MS; Zhuang Z; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(6):408-16. PubMed ID: 22606976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulated workplace protection factors for half-facepiece respiratory protective devices.
Duling MG; Lawrence RB; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Jun; 4(6):420-31. PubMed ID: 17474032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitting characteristics of eighteen N95 filtering-facepiece respirators.
Coffey CC; Lawrence RB; Campbell DL; Zhuang Z; Calvert CA; Jensen PA
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Apr; 1(4):262-71. PubMed ID: 15204866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Fit for Sealed and Loose-Fitting Surgical Masks and N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators.
Karuppasamy K; Obuchowski N
Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 May; 65(4):463-474. PubMed ID: 33458738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of three biological decontamination methods on filtering facepiece respirator fit, odor, comfort, and donning ease.
Viscusi DJ; Bergman MS; Novak DA; Faulkner KA; Palmiero A; Powell J; Shaffer RE
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jul; 8(7):426-36. PubMed ID: 21732856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Customized design and 3D printing of face seal for an N95 filtering facepiece respirator.
Cai M; Li H; Shen S; Wang Y; Yang Q
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Mar; 15(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29194018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analysis of forces generated by n95 filtering facepiece respirator tethering devices: a pilot study.
Roberge R; Niezgoda G; Benson S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2012; 9(8):517-23. PubMed ID: 22746194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
