These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376795)

  • 1. [A follow-up survey for hearing aids evaluation using speech maps].
    Hosoi H; Iida S; Murata K; Ohta F; Imaizumi S
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Apr; 93(4):590-5. PubMed ID: 2376795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hearing aid evaluation using psychoacoustical proximity between Japanese monosyllables.
    Hosoi H; Imaizumi S; Murata K; Ohta F
    Audiology; 1989; 28(3):171-8. PubMed ID: 2735850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of the Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for hearing aid comparisons.
    Cox RM; McDaniel DM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Jun; 32(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 2739387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of hearing improvement due to hearing aids].
    Welzl-Müller K; Sattler K
    HNO; 1985 Jun; 33(6):275-8. PubMed ID: 4030411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Influence of hearing aids on monosyllabic test score and subjective everyday hearing].
    Thümmler R; Liebscher T; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):595-600. PubMed ID: 27126291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response time and percentage correct as measures of hearing aid performance.
    Seavertson JM; McLennan RO
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1983 Nov; 48(4):409-14. PubMed ID: 6645436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing aid evaluation. Clinical experience with a new philosophy.
    Jerger J; Hayes D
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Apr; 102(4):214-25. PubMed ID: 1267705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of hearing aid rehabilitation using the Freiburg Monosyllabic Test].
    Hoppe U
    HNO; 2016 Aug; 64(8):589-94. PubMed ID: 27299893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The relation between hearing aid evaluations using magnitude estimation procedure and the speech discrimination ability].
    Hosoi H; Kohno K; Murata K; Ohta F
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1988 May; 91(5):703-9. PubMed ID: 3418440
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Paired comparison judgments of relative intelligibility in noise.
    Studebaker GA; Bisset JD; Van Ort DM; Hoffnung SU
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Jul; 72(1):80-92. PubMed ID: 7108046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of hearing aid users' satisfaction.
    Gerber SE; Fisher LB
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 511657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Some suggestions on how to evaluate a transposer hearing aid.
    Gengel RW; Foust KO
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1975 May; 40(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 1234931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Speech Intelligibility Index and the pure-tone average as predictors of lexical ability in children fit with hearing AIDS.
    Stiles DJ; Bentler RA; McGregor KK
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):764-78. PubMed ID: 22223888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of automatic signal-processing amplification on speech recognition in noise for persons with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Dempsey JJ
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1987; 96(3 Pt 1):251-3. PubMed ID: 3605946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Speech sound discrimination and hearing-aid performance of severely hearing impaired school children].
    Nakanishi Y
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1982 Apr; 85(4):422-31. PubMed ID: 7119926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Communication strategies used by individuals with moderate sensorineural hearing loss].
    de Mello JM; Oliveira JR; Dell'Aringa AH; Oliveira VV; Zacare CC
    Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 15109114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for the evaluation of hearing aids.
    Levitt H
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1978; (6):199-240. PubMed ID: 292143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Determining perceived sound quality in a simulated hearing aid using the international speech test signal.
    Arehart KH; Kates JM; Anderson MC; Moats P
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):533-5. PubMed ID: 21325947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.