These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2376795)

  • 41. [The influence of central auditory processing on the intelligibility of the speech in the patients presenting with hearing impairment].
    Boboshko MY; Berdnikova IP; Garbaruk ES; Salakhbekov MA; Mal'tseva NV
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2018; 83(2):4-8. PubMed ID: 29697645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Feb; 79(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 3950200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. [The evaluation of hearing aid effect in presbycusis].
    Lu HH; Chen Y; Wang W; Wang Y; Chen TS; Xu KX; Zhao H; Cheng Y; Ma YX; Lin P
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 May; 30(10):788-790. PubMed ID: 29798054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
    Martin TP; Lowther R; Cooper H; Holder RL; Irving RM; Reid AP; Proops DW
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2010 Aug; 35(4):284-90. PubMed ID: 20738337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Non-implantable Artificial Hearing Technology.
    Lu L; Zhang X; Gao X
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2019; 1130():145-163. PubMed ID: 30915706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of a programmable 3-channel compression hearing system with single-channel AGC instruments.
    Kiessling J; Steffens T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():67-74. PubMed ID: 8153566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Effects of speaking tube in patients with dysacousis].
    Sohma S; Tomomatsu H; Sugiuchi T; Katayama Y; Okamoto M
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1990 Apr; 93(4):622-9. PubMed ID: 2376800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [The analysis of subjective evaluations for hearing aids using fuzzy measure and fuzzy integral].
    Hayashi H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1992 Jan; 95(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 1545306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Satisfaction with fitted hearing aids. I. An analysis of technical information.
    Kapteyn TS
    Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 929092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Hearing-aid fitting protocol.
    Upfold LJ; Smither MF
    Br J Audiol; 1981 Aug; 15(3):181-8. PubMed ID: 7296096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Design Guidelines for Feedforward Cancellation of the Occlusion-Effect in Hearing Aids.
    Borges RC; Parreira WD; Costa MH
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2019 Jul; 2019():607-610. PubMed ID: 31945971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. A follow-up study of the CROS hearing aid.
    Aufricht H
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 Feb; 37(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 4559856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Financial Distress Experienced By Privately Insured Pediatric Hearing Aid Patients: A Pilot Study.
    Ostrowski T; Mouzakes J
    Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2022 Oct; 61(9):596-604. PubMed ID: 35677991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Computer-assisted hearing-aid evaluation and fitting program.
    Popelka GR
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1987; 37():166-8. PubMed ID: 3673811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Hearing aid evaluation methods: some underlying assumptions.
    Chial MR; Hayes CS
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1974 Aug; 39(3):270-9. PubMed ID: 4413640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Differential diagnosis of hearing impairments by means of a new analysis method of speech discrimination ability].
    Hosoi H
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1984 Aug; 87(8):992-1006. PubMed ID: 6512628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. An instrument for checking the hearing aid induction pick-up coil input.
    Pepper MG; Norris N
    Br J Audiol; 1986 May; 20(2):169-71. PubMed ID: 3719165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Application of statistical methods in hearing aid investigations.
    Ramig PR; Engelberg MW
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(5):277-80. PubMed ID: 7429037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hearing aid evaluation.
    EWERTSEN HW
    AMA Arch Otolaryngol; 1956 Dec; 64(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 13381263
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A comparison of two procedures for hearing-aid evaluation.
    SHORE I; KRAMER JC
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1963 May; 28():159-70. PubMed ID: 13988661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.