These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Anterior exposure of the spine for removal of lumbar interbody devices and implants. Nguyen HV; Akbarnia BA; van Dam BE; Raiszadeh K; Bagheri R; Canale S; Sylvain GM; Barone R; Bench G Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2449-53. PubMed ID: 17023854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications. Malham GM; Parker RM; Ellis NJ; Blecher CM; Chow FY; Claydon MH J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):851-60. PubMed ID: 25279655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acquired spondylolysis after implantation of a lumbar ProDisc II prosthesis: case report and review of the literature. Schulte TL; Lerner T; Hackenberg L; Liljenqvist U; Bullmann V Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):E645-8. PubMed ID: 18090074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The treatment of disabling multilevel lumbar discogenic low back pain with total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis: a prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Shah RV; Nanieva R; Pfeiffer F; Fenk-Mayer A; Kershaw T; Husted DS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Oct; 30(19):2192-9. PubMed ID: 16205346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ten-year survival and clinical outcome of the AcroFlex lumbar disc replacement for the treatment of symptomatic disc degeneration. Meir AR; Freeman BJ; Fraser RD; Fowler SM Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 23384880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Early removal of a Maverick disc prosthesis: surgical findings and morphological changes. François J; Coessens R; Lauweryns P Acta Orthop Belg; 2007 Feb; 73(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 17441671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach: clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Pimenta L; Oliveira L; Schaffa T; Coutinho E; Marchi L J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 21166491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Removal of the Charité lumbar artificial disc prosthesis: surgical technique. de Maat GH; Punt IM; van Rhijn LW; Schurink GW; van Ooij A J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 19525788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Delayed formation of a devastating granulomatous process after metal-on-metal lumbar disc arthroplasty. Cabraja M; Schmeding M; Koch A; Podrabsky P; Kroppenstedt S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jun; 37(13):E809-13. PubMed ID: 22089396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Midline anterior approach from the right side to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement: a new mobilization technique of the vena cava. Edgard-Rosa G; Geneste G; Nègre G; Marnay T Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):E562-9. PubMed ID: 22517482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective, randomized trial of metal-on-metal artificial lumbar disc replacement: initial results for treatment of discogenic pain. Sasso RC; Foulk DM; Hahn M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 18197095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]