403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23768845)
1. In-situ subaqueous capping of mercury-contaminated sediments in a fresh-water aquatic system, Part I-Bench-scale microcosm study to assess methylmercury production.
Randall PM; Fimmen R; Lal V; Darlington R
Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():30-40. PubMed ID: 23768845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-situ subaqueous capping of mercury-contaminated sediments in a fresh-water aquatic system, Part II-evaluation of sorption materials.
Randall PM; Yates BJ; Lal V; Darlington R; Fimmen R
Environ Res; 2013 Aug; 125():41-51. PubMed ID: 23735286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of sulfate reducing bacteria and sulfate concentrations on mercury methylation in freshwater sediments.
Shao D; Kang Y; Wu S; Wong MH
Sci Total Environ; 2012 May; 424():331-6. PubMed ID: 22444059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissolved organic matter enhances microbial mercury methylation under sulfidic conditions.
Graham AM; Aiken GR; Gilmour CC
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):2715-23. PubMed ID: 22309093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Environmental assessment of mercury dispersion, transformation and bioavailability in the Lake Victoria Goldfields, Tanzania.
Ikingura JR; Akagi H; Mujumba J; Messo C
J Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 81(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 16782263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carbon Amendments Alter Microbial Community Structure and Net Mercury Methylation Potential in Sediments.
Christensen GA; Somenahally AC; Moberly JG; Miller CM; King AJ; Gilmour CC; Brown SD; Podar M; Brandt CC; Brooks SC; Palumbo AV; Wall JD; Elias DA
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2018 Feb; 84(3):. PubMed ID: 29150503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sulfate-reducing bacteria methylate mercury at variable rates in pure culture and in marine sediments.
King JK; Kostka JE; Frischer ME; Saunders FM
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2000 Jun; 66(6):2430-7. PubMed ID: 10831421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methylmercury cycling in High Arctic wetland ponds: controls on sedimentary production.
Lehnherr I; St Louis VL; Kirk JL
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Oct; 46(19):10523-31. PubMed ID: 22799567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Activated carbon mitigates mercury and methylmercury bioavailability in contaminated sediments.
Gilmour CC; Riedel GS; Riedel G; Kwon S; Landis R; Brown SS; Menzie CA; Ghosh U
Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Nov; 47(22):13001-10. PubMed ID: 24156748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do potential methylation rates reflect accumulated methyl mercury in contaminated sediments?
Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Skyllberg U
Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 18350890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio desulfuricans ND132 as a model for understanding bacterial mercury methylation.
Gilmour CC; Elias DA; Kucken AM; Brown SD; Palumbo AV; Schadt CW; Wall JD
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2011 Jun; 77(12):3938-51. PubMed ID: 21515733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of organic matter addition on methylmercury formation in capped and uncapped marine sediments.
Ndungu K; Schaanning M; Braaten HFV
Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():401-407. PubMed ID: 27494695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Net methylation of mercury in estuarine sediment microcosms amended with dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.
Zhang T; Kucharzyk KH; Kim B; Deshusses MA; Hsu-Kim H
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9133-41. PubMed ID: 25007388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Phytoremediation of mercury- and methyl mercury-contaminated sediments by water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes).
Chattopadhyay S; Fimmen RL; Yates BJ; Lal V; Randall P
Int J Phytoremediation; 2012 Feb; 14(2):142-61. PubMed ID: 22567701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Importance of dissolved neutral mercury sulfides for methyl mercury production in contaminated sediments.
Drott A; Lambertsson L; Björn E; Skyllberg U
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2270-6. PubMed ID: 17438774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mercury distribution and methylmercury mobility in the sediments of three sites on the Lebanese coast, eastern Mediterranean.
Abi-Ghanem C; Nakhlé K; Khalaf G; Cossa D
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 Apr; 60(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 20625711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methylation of mercury by bacteria exposed to dissolved, nanoparticulate, and microparticulate mercuric sulfides.
Zhang T; Kim B; Levard C; Reinsch BC; Lowry GV; Deshusses MA; Hsu-Kim H
Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(13):6950-8. PubMed ID: 22145980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Kinetics of Enzymatic Mercury Methylation at Nanomolar Concentrations Catalyzed by HgcAB.
Date SS; Parks JM; Rush KW; Wall JD; Ragsdale SW; Johs A
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 85(13):. PubMed ID: 31028026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Novel methodology for the study of mercury methylation and reduction in sediments and water using 197Hg radiotracer.
Ribeiro Guevara S; Zizek S; Repinc U; Pérez Catán S; Jaćimović R; Horvat M
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2007 Mar; 387(6):2185-97. PubMed ID: 17205268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Horizontal and vertical variability of mercury species in pore water and sediments in small lakes in Ontario.
He T; Lu J; Yang F; Feng X
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Nov; 386(1-3):53-64. PubMed ID: 17720225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
