146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23769355)
1. The estimation of genomic relationships using breedwise allele frequencies among animals in multibreed populations.
Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2013 Aug; 96(8):5364-75. PubMed ID: 23769355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Genomic inbreeding and relationships among Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.
VanRaden PM; Olson KM; Wiggans GR; Cole JB; Tooker ME
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Nov; 94(11):5673-82. PubMed ID: 22032391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using the unified relationship matrix adjusted by breed-wise allele frequencies in genomic evaluation of a multibreed population.
Makgahlela ML; Strandén I; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Mäntysaari EA
J Dairy Sci; 2014 Feb; 97(2):1117-27. PubMed ID: 24342683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genomic predictions across Nordic Holstein and Nordic Red using the genomic best linear unbiased prediction model with different genomic relationship matrices.
Zhou L; Lund MS; Wang Y; Su G
J Anim Breed Genet; 2014 Aug; 131(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 24750283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.
Steyn Y; Lourenco DAL; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 97(11):4418-4427. PubMed ID: 31539424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Crossbreed evaluations in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor using adjusted realized relationship matrices.
Lourenco DA; Tsuruta S; Fragomeni BO; Chen CY; Herring WO; Misztal I
J Anim Sci; 2016 Mar; 94(3):909-19. PubMed ID: 27065253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predicting the effect of reference population on the accuracy of within, across, and multibreed genomic prediction.
van den Berg I; Meuwissen THE; MacLeod IM; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Apr; 102(4):3155-3174. PubMed ID: 30738664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.
Khansefid M; Pryce JE; Bolormaa S; Miller SP; Wang Z; Li C; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2014 Aug; 92(8):3270-83. PubMed ID: 25074450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic evaluation of regional dairy cattle breeds in single-breed and multibreed contexts.
Jónás D; Ducrocq V; Fritz S; Baur A; Sanchez MP; Croiseau P
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Feb; 134(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 27917542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multibreed beef cattle populations derived from deregressed breeding values and phenotypes.
Weber KL; Thallman RM; Keele JW; Snelling WM; Bennett GL; Smith TP; McDaneld TG; Allan MF; Van Eenennaam AL; Kuehn LA
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4177-90. PubMed ID: 22767091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Short communication: Genomic selection using a multi-breed, across-country reference population.
Pryce JE; Gredler B; Bolormaa S; Bowman PJ; Egger-Danner C; Fuerst C; Emmerling R; Sölkner J; Goddard ME; Hayes BJ
J Dairy Sci; 2011 May; 94(5):2625-30. PubMed ID: 21524555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multibreed genomic evaluation for production traits of dairy cattle in the United States using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor.
Cesarani A; Lourenco D; Tsuruta S; Legarra A; Nicolazzi EL; VanRaden PM; Misztal I
J Dairy Sci; 2022 Jun; 105(6):5141-5152. PubMed ID: 35282922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.
Olson KM; VanRaden PM; Tooker ME
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5378-5383. PubMed ID: 22916944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A simple method to separate base population and segregation effects in genomic relationship matrices.
Plieschke L; Edel C; Pimentel EC; Emmerling R; Bennewitz J; Götz KU
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Jun; 47(1):53. PubMed ID: 26100390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficient and accurate computation of base generation allele frequencies.
Aldridge MN; Vandenplas J; Calus MPL
J Dairy Sci; 2019 Feb; 102(2):1364-1373. PubMed ID: 30471906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of kinship matrices on genetic gain and inbreeding with optimum contribution selection in a genomic dairy cattle breeding program.
Gautason E; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Berg P
Genet Sel Evol; 2023 Jul; 55(1):48. PubMed ID: 37460999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Across breed multi-trait random regression genomic predictions in the Nordic Red dairy cattle.
Makgahlela ML; Mäntysaari EA; Strandén I; Koivula M; Nielsen US; Sillanpää MJ; Juga J
J Anim Breed Genet; 2013 Feb; 130(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 23317061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
