These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23769959)

  • 1. Stress improves task processing efficiency in dual-tasks.
    Beste C; Yildiz A; Meissner TW; Wolf OT
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Sep; 252():260-5. PubMed ID: 23769959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response activation in overlapping tasks and the response-selection bottleneck.
    Schubert T; Fischer R; Stelzel C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):376-97. PubMed ID: 18377177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Probing the cortical network underlying the psychological refractory period: a combined EEG-fMRI study.
    Hesselmann G; Flandin G; Dehaene S
    Neuroimage; 2011 Jun; 56(3):1608-21. PubMed ID: 21397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Viewer perspective affects central bottleneck requirements in spatial translation tasks.
    Franz EA; Sebastian A; Hust C; Norris T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 18377178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the optimality of serial and parallel processing in the psychological refractory period paradigm: effects of the distribution of stimulus onset asynchronies.
    Miller J; Ulrich R; Rolke B
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 May; 58(3):273-310. PubMed ID: 19281972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing two tasks with varying task order: central stage duration influences central processing order.
    Ruiz Fernández S; Leonhard T; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 21427007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dual-task processing when task 1 is hard and task 2 is easy: reversed central processing order?
    Leonhard T; Fernández SR; Ulrich R; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Feb; 37(1):115-36. PubMed ID: 20718575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The source of execution-related dual-task interference: motor bottleneck or response monitoring?
    Bratzke D; Rolke B; Ulrich R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1413-26. PubMed ID: 19803646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introspective reports of reaction times in dual-tasks reflect experienced difficulty rather than timing of cognitive processes.
    Bryce D; Bratzke D
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():254-67. PubMed ID: 24956469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The socially evaluated cold-pressor test (SECPT) for groups: effects of repeated administration of a combined physiological and psychological stressor.
    Minkley N; Schröder TP; Wolf OT; Kirchner WH
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2014 Jul; 45():119-27. PubMed ID: 24845183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When underadditivity of factor effects in the Psychological Refractory Period paradigm implies a bottleneck: evidence from psycholinguistics.
    Besner D; Reynolds M; O'Malley S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Nov; 62(11):2222-34. PubMed ID: 19370482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of acute stress on spatial tasks in humans.
    Richardson AE; VanderKaay Tomasulo MM
    Physiol Behav; 2011 Jul; 103(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 21440564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigating limits of task prioritization in dual-tasking: evidence from the prioritized processing and the psychological refractory period paradigms.
    Rieger T; Mittelstädt V; Dignath D; Kiesel A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):384-396. PubMed ID: 31552483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-task performance is differentially modulated by rewards and punishments.
    Yildiz A; Chmielewski W; Beste C
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Aug; 250():304-7. PubMed ID: 23680164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress induces a functional asymmetry in an emotional attention task.
    Brüne M; Nadolny N; Güntürkün O; Wolf OT
    Cogn Emot; 2013; 27(3):558-66. PubMed ID: 23005338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence of resource sharing in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm.
    Mittelstädt V; Mackenzie IG; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1279-1293. PubMed ID: 36107664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parallel and serial processing in dual-tasking differentially involves mechanisms in the striatum and the lateral prefrontal cortex.
    Yildiz A; Beste C
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Nov; 220(6):3131-42. PubMed ID: 25017192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Response grouping in the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm: models and contamination effects.
    Ulrich R; Miller J
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Sep; 57(2):75-121. PubMed ID: 18262510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evidence for a response preparation bottleneck during dual-task performance: effect of a startling acoustic stimulus on the psychological refractory period.
    Maslovat D; Chua R; Spencer HC; Forgaard CJ; Carlsen AN; Franks IM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):481-7. PubMed ID: 24076331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.