These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23769959)

  • 21. Central interference in driving: is there any stopping the psychological refractory period?
    Levy J; Pashler H; Boer E
    Psychol Sci; 2006 Mar; 17(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 16507063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Localizing practice effects in dual-task performance.
    Sangals J; Wilwer M; Sommer W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):860-76. PubMed ID: 17514598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Salivary alpha amylase and cortisol responses to different stress tasks: impact of sex.
    van Stegeren AH; Wolf OT; Kindt M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Jul; 69(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 18417235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multisession, dual-task psychological refractory period practice benefits older and younger adults equally.
    Allen PA; Ruthruff E; Elicker JD; Lien MC
    Exp Aging Res; 2009 Oct; 35(4):369-99. PubMed ID: 20183098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Park BY; Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 29124674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Multitasking and aging: do older adults benefit from performing a highly practiced task?
    Allen PA; Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Voss A
    Exp Aging Res; 2014; 40(3):280-307. PubMed ID: 24785592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dual-task performance with ideomotor-compatible tasks: is the central processing bottleneck intact, bypassed, or shifted in locus?
    Lien MC; McCann RS; Ruthruff E; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Feb; 31(1):122-44. PubMed ID: 15709868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Splitting of the P3 component during dual-task processing in a patient with posterior callosal section.
    Hesselmann G; Naccache L; Cohen L; Dehaene S
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):730-47. PubMed ID: 22542264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-modal psychological refractory period in vision, audition, and haptics.
    Rau PP; Zheng J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1573-1585. PubMed ID: 32052346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Action-effect codes in and before the central bottleneck: evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.
    Paelecke M; Kunde W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Jun; 33(3):627-44. PubMed ID: 17563226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Does the central bottleneck encompass voluntary selection of hedonically based choices?
    Pashler H; Harris CR; Nuechterlein KH
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):313-21. PubMed ID: 25116298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Temporal discrimination of one's own reaction times in dual-task performance: Context effects and methodological constraints.
    Bratzke D; Bryce D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Aug; 78(6):1806-16. PubMed ID: 27311578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Processing order in dual-task situations: The "first-come, first-served" principle and the impact of task order instructions.
    Strobach T; Hendrich E; Kübler S; Müller H; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1785-1803. PubMed ID: 29978280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Determinants of central processing order in psychological refractory period paradigms: central arrival times, detection times, or preparation?
    Leonhard T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):2012-43. PubMed ID: 21678229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Investigation of reward effects in overlapping dual-task situations.
    Langsdorf LE; Kübler S; Schubert T
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Feb; 222():103465. PubMed ID: 34922040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The time course of psychological stress as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Yang J; Qi M; Guan L; Hou Y; Yang Y
    Neurosci Lett; 2012 Nov; 530(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 23032784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.
    Schumacher EH; Schwarb H
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 May; 138(2):270-90. PubMed ID: 19397384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. How Social and Refractory Is the Social Psychological Refractory Period?
    Wühr P; Heuer H
    Exp Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 28922997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Information continuity across the response selection bottleneck: early parallel Task 2 response activation contributes to overt Task 2 performance.
    Thomson SJ; Watter S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):934-53. PubMed ID: 23592183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance.
    Janczyk M; Pfister R; Hommel B; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 24747873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.