These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23770084)

  • 1. Long-term test-retest reliability of the P3 NoGo wave and two independent components decomposed from the P3 NoGo wave in a visual Go/NoGo task.
    Brunner JF; Hansen TI; Olsen A; Skandsen T; Håberg A; Kropotov J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):106-14. PubMed ID: 23770084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Test-retest reliability of ERP components: A short-term replication of a visual Go/NoGo task in ADHD subjects.
    Kompatsiari K; Candrian G; Mueller A
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar; 617():166-72. PubMed ID: 26861197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual sensory processing deficit in the occipital region in children with attention-deficit / hyperactivity disorder as revealed by event-related potentials during cued continuous performance test.
    Nazari MA; Berquin P; Missonnier P; Aarabi A; Debatisse D; De Broca A; Wallois F
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2010 Jun; 40(3):137-49. PubMed ID: 20513613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Event-related potentials for response inhibition in Parkinson's disease.
    Bokura H; Yamaguchi S; Kobayashi S
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):967-75. PubMed ID: 15716167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relationship between ERP components and EEG spatial complexity in a visual Go/Nogo task.
    Jia H; Li H; Yu D
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):275-283. PubMed ID: 27784803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
    Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
    Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prestimulus alpha and beta determinants of ERP responses in the Go/NoGo task.
    De Blasio FM; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 23643562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Event-related potentials to response production and inhibition in go/nogo task. I. Topographical characteristics to different visual stimulus sequences].
    Kaga Y; Iwadare Y; Noguchi S; Tando T; Aihara M
    No To Hattatsu; 2008 Jan; 40(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 18210859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: a temporal PCA study.
    Barry RJ; De Blasio FM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 23792217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
    Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. CNV resolution does not cause NoGo anteriorisation of the P3: a failure to replicate Simson et al.
    Smith JL; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Sep; 89(3):349-57. PubMed ID: 23669175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
    Randall WM; Smith JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neuropsychological parameters indexing executive processes are associated with independent components of ERPs.
    Brunner JF; Olsen A; Aasen IE; Løhaugen GC; Håberg AK; Kropotov J
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():144-56. PubMed ID: 25448863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
    Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.
    Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ; Markovska V; Dimoska A; Clarke AR
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 May; 72(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 19095016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. EEG-ERP dynamics in a visual Continuous Performance Test.
    Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Steiner GZ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():249-260. PubMed ID: 31648022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The relationship of N2 and P3 to inhibitory processing of social drinkers in a Go/NoGo task.
    Oddy BW; Barry RJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):323-30. PubMed ID: 19250950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Emotional context modulates response inhibition: neural and behavioral data.
    Albert J; López-Martín S; Carretié L
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):914-21. PubMed ID: 19716425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of inter-stimulus interval on skin conductance responses and event-related potentials in a Go/NoGo task.
    Recio G; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Feb; 80(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 19022336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.