These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23770655)

  • 1. Repeatability of ocular response analyzer metrics: a gender-based study.
    David VP; Stead RE; Vernon SA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):691-9. PubMed ID: 23770655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of sex differences in corneal hysteresis.
    Allam RS; Khalil NM
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2015; 25(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 25684160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility and clinical relevance of the ocular response analyzer in nonoperated eyes: corneal biomechanical and tonometric implications.
    Moreno-Montañés J; Maldonado MJ; García N; Mendiluce L; García-Gómez PJ; Seguí-Gómez M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 Mar; 49(3):968-74. PubMed ID: 18326720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects.
    Oncel B; Dinc UA; Gorgun E; Yalvaç BI
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2009; 19(5):798-803. PubMed ID: 19787600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Repeatability of intraocular pressure and corneal biomechanical properties measurements by the ocular response analyser.
    Kynigopoulos M; Schlote T; Kotecha A; Tzamalis A; Pajic B; Haefliger I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2008 May; 225(5):357-60. PubMed ID: 18454372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precision of ocular response analyzer.
    Goebels SC; Seitz B; Langenbucher A
    Curr Eye Res; 2012 Aug; 37(8):689-93. PubMed ID: 22587394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of Valsalva manoeuvre on Ocular Response Analyzer measurements.
    Palamar M; Dag MY; Yagci A
    Clin Exp Optom; 2015 Sep; 98(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 26390907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in biomechanical properties of the cornea and intraocular pressure after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using a femtosecond laser for flap creation determined using ocular response analyzer and Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Shin J; Kim TW; Park SJ; Yoon M; Lee JW
    J Glaucoma; 2015 Mar; 24(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 23807345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corvis ST Tonometer for Measuring Postoperative IOP in LASIK Patients.
    Hong J; Yu Z; Jiang C; Zhou X; Liu Z; Sun X; Xu J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2015 May; 92(5):589-95. PubMed ID: 25871871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeatability of Ocular Response Analyzer waveform parameters in normal eyes and eyes after refractive surgery.
    Landoulsi H; Saad A; Haddad NN; Guilbert E; Gatinel D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 29(10):709-14. PubMed ID: 24094311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal-tension glaucoma.
    Morita T; Shoji N; Kamiya K; Fujimura F; Shimizu K
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e48-53. PubMed ID: 21914145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Corneal viscoelastic differences between pseudoexfoliative glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma.
    Ozkok A; Tamcelik N; Ozdamar A; Sarici AM; Cicik E
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Dec; 22(9):740-5. PubMed ID: 24299728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of selective laser trabeculoplasty on corneal biomechanics.
    Pillunat KR; Spoerl E; Terai N; Pillunat LE
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Sep; 94(6):e501-4. PubMed ID: 26749244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A; David RL; Asokan R; George R
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the intraocular pressure measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Ogbuehi KC; Almubrad TM
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Jul; 35(7):587-96. PubMed ID: 20597645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.