These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771011)

  • 21. Eye sensitivity in soft contact lens wearers.
    Spyridon M; Hickson-Curran S; Hunt C; Young G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Dec; 89(12):1682-90. PubMed ID: 23190713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subjective Ratings and Satisfaction in Contact Lens Wear.
    Diec J; Naduvilath T; Tilia D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Mar; 95(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 29424828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ocular surface comfort during the day assessed by instant reporting in different types of contact and non-contact lens wearers.
    Santodomingo-Rubido J; Barrado-Navascués E; Rubido-Crespo MJ
    Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Mar; 36(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 20145542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Practical experience with a high Dk lotrafilcon A fluorosilicone hydrogel extended wear contact lens in Spain.
    Montero Iruzubieta J; Nebot Ripoll JR; Chiva J; Fernández OE; Rubio Alvarez JJ; Delgado F; Villa C; Traverso LM
    CLAO J; 2001 Jan; 27(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 11215605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of lens and solution choice on the comfort of contact lens wearers.
    Tilia D; Lazon de la Jara P; Peng N; Papas EB; Holden BA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 May; 90(5):411-8. PubMed ID: 23538435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?
    Woods J; Woods CA; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 19675462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Contact lenses in pediatrics study in Singapore.
    Li L; Moody K; Tan DT; Yew KC; Ming PY; Long QB
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Jul; 35(4):188-95. PubMed ID: 19516144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of previous extended and daily wear schedules on signs and symptoms with high Dk lotrafilcon A lenses.
    Chalmers RL; Dillehay S; Long B; Barr JT; Bergenske P; Donshik P; Secor G; Yoakum J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 82(6):549-54. PubMed ID: 15976593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rewetting drops containing surface active agents improve the clinical performance of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.
    Subbaraman LN; Bayer S; Glasier MA; Lorentz H; Senchyna M; Jones L
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Mar; 83(3):143-51. PubMed ID: 16534456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Three-year follow-up of biomicroscopy signs and refractive status in patients wearing lotrafilcon A lenses.
    Long B; Malet F; Lejeune M; George-Vicariot MN; Pagot R; Peyre C; Subirana X
    Eye Contact Lens; 2005 Nov; 31(6):263-7. PubMed ID: 16284505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comfort-enhanced daily disposable contact lens reduces symptoms among weekly/monthly wear patients.
    Fahmy M; Long B; Giles T; Wang CH
    Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Jul; 36(4):215-9. PubMed ID: 20543705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Daily Wear Contact Lenses Manufactured in Etafilcon A Are Noninferior to Two Silicone Hydrogel Lens Types With Respect to Hypoxic Stress.
    Szczotka-Flynn LB; Debanne S; Benetz BA; Wilson T; Brennan N
    Eye Contact Lens; 2018 May; 44(3):190-199. PubMed ID: 27768615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical investigation of asmofilcon a silicone hydrogel lenses.
    Lakkis C; Vincent S
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Apr; 86(4):350-6. PubMed ID: 19258913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Multi-centre evaluation of two daily disposable contact lenses.
    Walker J; Young G; Hunt C; Henderson T
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2007 May; 30(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 17395523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Extended-wear silicone hydrogel soft contact lenses in the management of moderate to severe dry eye signs and symptoms secondary to graft-versus-host disease.
    Russo PA; Bouchard CS; Galasso JM
    Eye Contact Lens; 2007 May; 33(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 17502749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Demographic Factors Affect Ocular Comfort Ratings During Contact Lens Wear.
    Naduvilath T; Papas EB; Lazon de la Jara P
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 93(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 27254808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating a just-noticeable difference for ocular comfort in contact lens wearers.
    Papas EB; Keay L; Golebiowski B
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Jun; 52(7):4390-4. PubMed ID: 21498609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Successful monovision contact lens wearers refitted with bifocal contact lenses.
    Situ P; Du Toit R; Fonn D; Simpson T
    Eye Contact Lens; 2003 Jul; 29(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 12861114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Risk factors for corneal infiltrates with continuous wear of contact lenses.
    Chalmers RL; McNally JJ; Schein OD; Katz J; Tielsch JM; Alfonso E; Bullimore M; O'Day D; Shovlin J
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):573-9. PubMed ID: 17632304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Adverse events with extended wear of disposable hydrogels: results for the first 13 months of lens wear.
    Sankaridurg PR; Sweeney DF; Sharma S; Gora R; Naduvilath T; Ramachandran L; Holden BA; Rao GN
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Sep; 106(9):1671-80. PubMed ID: 10485533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.