These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771229)

  • 1. Genes can't be patented, rules Supreme Court.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2013 Jun; 346():f3907. PubMed ID: 23771229
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intellectual property. Supreme Court rules out patents on 'natural' genes.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2013 Jun; 340(6139):1387-8. PubMed ID: 23788772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. US Supreme Court is asked to rule on validity of patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6624. PubMed ID: 23033368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US Supreme Court hears arguments in case of BRCA1 and BRCA2 [corrected] patents.
    McCarthy M
    BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2446. PubMed ID: 23596230
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court will rule on whether patents for BRAC1 and BRAC2 genes are valid.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8266. PubMed ID: 23223689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case.
    Sklan A
    Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Sep; 2(5):581. PubMed ID: 24237164
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gene patenting--the Supreme Court finally speaks.
    Kesselheim AS; Cook-Deegan RM; Winickoff DE; Mello MM
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(9):869-75. PubMed ID: 23841703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Supreme Court ruling broadens BRCA testing options.
    Azvolinsky A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2013 Nov; 105(22):1671-2. PubMed ID: 24198329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supremes got it right.
    Somberg J
    Am J Ther; 2013; 20(4):315. PubMed ID: 23838630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US Supreme Court applies strict limits to patents.
    Robertson D
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Jul; 20(7):639. PubMed ID: 12089532
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The Supreme Court free genes - economic and legal justifications - impacts on innovation and the healthcare offer].
    Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D
    Med Sci (Paris); 2015 Feb; 31(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 25744269
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data disclosure crucial after DNA patent verdict.
    de Costa A
    Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6149):959. PubMed ID: 23990544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intellectual property. Biotech feels a chill from changing U.S. patent rules.
    Servick K
    Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6192):14-5. PubMed ID: 24994626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patents. U.S. appeals court hears gene patent arguments.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2012 Jul; 337(6092):277-8. PubMed ID: 22822118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BRCA patent dispute may head to US Supreme Court.
    Devi S
    Lancet; 2012 Jan; 379(9813):300. PubMed ID: 22292161
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patents. U.S. Supreme Court delves into what is and isn't patentable.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5933):1374. PubMed ID: 19520926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intellectual property. In a flurry of metaphors, justices debate a limit on gene patents.
    Marshall E
    Science; 2013 Apr; 340(6131):421. PubMed ID: 23620028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Federal Circuit's decision in Myriad: isolated DNA molecules are patentable subject matter.
    Ogden SR
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):443-56. PubMed ID: 25335196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genetics. Moving beyond "isolated" gene patents.
    Rai AK; Cook-Deegan R
    Science; 2013 Jul; 341(6142):137-8. PubMed ID: 23811224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pharmaceutical patent life-cycle management after KSR v. Teleflex.
    Furrow ME
    Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(1):275-320. PubMed ID: 18561462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.