These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771297)

  • 1. Tuned for the future: intentions are only accessible when a retrieval opportunity is near.
    Schult JC; Steffens MC
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Nov; 41(8):1252-60. PubMed ID: 23771297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the representation of intentions: do personally relevant consequences determine activation?
    Schult JC; Steffens MC
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Nov; 39(8):1487-95. PubMed ID: 21590462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond prospective memory retrieval: Encoding and remembering of intentions across the lifespan.
    Hering A; Wild-Wall N; Falkenstein M; Gajewski PD; Zinke K; Altgassen M; Kliegel M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jan; 147():44-59. PubMed ID: 31733225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatiotemporal pattern of brain electrical activity related to immediate and delayed episodic memory retrieval.
    Rivas-Fernández MÁ; Galdo-Álvarez S; Zurrón M; Díaz F; Lindín M
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Nov; 175():107309. PubMed ID: 32890759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults.
    Scullin MK; Bugg JM; McDaniel MA; Einstein GO
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1232-40. PubMed ID: 21557005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective memory and aging: evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues.
    Mullet HG; Scullin MK; Hess TJ; Scullin RB; Arnold KM; Einstein GO
    Psychol Aging; 2013 Dec; 28(4):910-22. PubMed ID: 24364398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Familiarity and personal experience as mediators of recall when planning for future contingencies.
    Klein SB; Robertson TE; Delton AW; Lax ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):240-5. PubMed ID: 21859232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Investigating how implementation intentions improve non-focal prospective memory tasks.
    Smith RE; McConnell Rogers MD; McVay JC; Lopez JA; Loft S
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():213-30. PubMed ID: 24929276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Memory for future actions: the effect of prospective memory on an explicit and implicit memory task.
    Grandi F; Ruiz Sánchez de León JM
    Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):54-59. PubMed ID: 31954416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of enactment and intention accessibility on prospective memory performance.
    Schult JC; Steffens MC
    Mem Cognit; 2017 May; 45(4):625-638. PubMed ID: 27981506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task context and organization in free recall.
    Polyn SM; Norman KA; Kahana MJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Sep; 47(11):2158-63. PubMed ID: 19524086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impaired cue identification and intention retrieval underlie prospective memory deficits in patients with first-episode schizophrenia.
    Liu D; Ji C; Zhuo K; Song Z; Wang Y; Mei L; Zhu D; Xiang Q; Chen T; Yang Z; Zhu G; Wang Y; Cheung EF; Xiang YT; Fan X; Chan RC; Xu Y; Jiang K
    Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2017 Mar; 51(3):270-277. PubMed ID: 27004487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of age on the neural correlates of retrieval cue processing are modulated by task demands.
    Duverne S; Motamedinia S; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jan; 21(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 18476757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Recognition-induced forgetting is caused by episodic, not semantic, memory retrieval tasks.
    Maxcey AM; McCann M; Stallkamp S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1539-1547. PubMed ID: 32034720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions.
    Beck SM; Ruge H; Walser M; Goschke T
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Jan; 52():37-50. PubMed ID: 24200918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prior Emotional Context Modulates Early Event-Related Potentials to Neutral Retrieval Cues.
    Bowen HJ; Fields EC; Kensinger EA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Nov; 31(11):1755-1767. PubMed ID: 31322466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrieval intentionality and forgetting: How retention time and cue distinctiveness affect involuntary and voluntary retrieval of episodic memories.
    Staugaard SR; Berntsen D
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):893-905. PubMed ID: 30725379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval.
    Herron JE; Evans LH; Wilding EL
    Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():24-31. PubMed ID: 26892854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The fate of completed intentions.
    Anderson FT; Einstein GO
    Memory; 2017 Apr; 25(4):467-480. PubMed ID: 27206804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.