461 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771446)
1. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants.
Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R
Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants.
Conrad HJ; Pesun IJ; DeLong R; Hodges JS
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6):349-56. PubMed ID: 17618917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An
Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of implant divergence on the accuracy of definitive casts created from traditional and digital implant-level impressions: an in vitro comparative study.
Lin WS; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Abdel-Azim T; Morton D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 25615919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection.
Wenz HJ; Hertrampf K
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 18416411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Digital evaluation of the accuracy of impression techniques and materials in angulated implants.
Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S; Ozan O; Ozcelik TB; Yagiz A
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1551-9. PubMed ID: 25446736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the Effect of Different Impression Techniques and Splinting Methods on the Dimensional Accuracy of Multiple Implant Impressions: An in vitro Study.
Saini HS; Jain S; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Choudhary S; Reddy NK
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Aug; 19(8):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 30150505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations.
Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions.
Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions.
Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of 2 impression techniques for ITI implants.
Akça K; Cehreli MC
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):517-23. PubMed ID: 15346748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Accuracy of implant impressions with different impression coping types and shapes.
Rashidan N; Alikhasi M; Samadizadeh S; Beyabanaki E; Kharazifard MJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 19804420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of accuracy of hexed and nonhexed pickup impression copings in a multiple variable impression setup for recording multiple straight and angulated implant positions: An
Kaur T; Singla S; Kumar L
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(1):21-29. PubMed ID: 36588371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.
Vigolo P; Fonzi F; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Nov; 92(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 15523336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials.
Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of the effects of implant position, impression material, and tray type on implant impression accuracy.
Gökçen-Rohlig B; Ongül D; Sancakli E; Sermet B
Implant Dent; 2014 Jun; 23(3):283-8. PubMed ID: 24844388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
