230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771600)
1. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.
De Coninck T; Jans L; Sys G; Huysse W; Verstraeten T; Forsyth R; Poffyn B; Verstraete K
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3140-52. PubMed ID: 23771600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?
Douis H; Parry M; Vaiyapuri S; Davies AM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):398-409. PubMed ID: 28695356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study.
Lisson CS; Lisson CG; Flosdorf K; Mayer-Steinacker R; Schultheiss M; von Baer A; Barth TFE; Beer AJ; Baumhauer M; Meier R; Beer M; Schmidt SA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):468-477. PubMed ID: 28884356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can imaging criteria distinguish enchondroma from grade 1 chondrosarcoma?
Crim J; Schmidt R; Layfield L; Hanrahan C; Manaster BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2222-30. PubMed ID: 26220916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma.
Douis H; Singh L; Saifuddin A
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):232-40. PubMed ID: 24337911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cartilaginous tumors: fast contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
Geirnaerdt MJ; Hogendoorn PC; Bloem JL; Taminiau AH; van der Woude HJ
Radiology; 2000 Feb; 214(2):539-46. PubMed ID: 10671608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients.
De Beuckeleer LH; De Schepper AM; Ramon F; Somville J
Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8654456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How safe is curettage of low-grade cartilaginous neoplasms diagnosed by imaging with or without pre-operative needle biopsy?
Brown MT; Gikas PD; Bhamra JS; Skinner JA; Aston WJ; Pollock RC; Saifuddin A; Briggs TW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug; 96-B(8):1098-105. PubMed ID: 25086127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevalence of cartilaginous tumours as an incidental finding on MRI of the knee.
Stomp W; Reijnierse M; Kloppenburg M; de Mutsert R; Bovée JV; den Heijer M; Bloem JL;
Eur Radiol; 2015 Dec; 25(12):3480-7. PubMed ID: 25994192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.
Murphey MD; Flemming DJ; Boyea SR; Bojescul JA; Sweet DE; Temple HT
Radiographics; 1998; 18(5):1213-37; quiz 1244-5. PubMed ID: 9747616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A retrospective external validation study of the Birmingham Atypical Cartilage Tumour Imaging Protocol (BACTIP) for the management of solitary central cartilage tumours of the proximal humerus and around the knee.
Van Den Berghe T; Delbare F; Candries E; Lejoly M; Algoet C; Chen M; Laloo F; Huysse WCJ; Creytens D; Verstraete KL
Eur Radiol; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38319428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic Enchondroma Surveillance: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Costs Effectiveness.
Akoh CC; Craig E; Troester AM; Miller BJ
Iowa Orthop J; 2019; 39(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 31413693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. MR of enchondroma and chondrosarcoma: rings and arcs of Gd-DTPA enhancement.
Aoki J; Sone S; Fujioka F; Terayama K; Ishii K; Karakida O; Imai S; Sakai F; Imai Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1991; 15(6):1011-6. PubMed ID: 1939751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma.
Choi BB; Jee WH; Sunwoo HJ; Cho JH; Kim JY; Chun KA; Hong SJ; Chung HW; Sung MS; Lee YS; Chung YG
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):542-7. PubMed ID: 23041161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Overutilization and Cost of Advanced Imaging for Long-Bone Cartilaginous Lesions.
Wilson RJ; Zumsteg JW; Hartley KA; Long JH; Mesko NW; Halpern JL; Schwartz HS; Holt GE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3466-73. PubMed ID: 25564171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improved performance in differentiating benign from malignant sinonasal tumors using diffusion-weighted combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.
Wang XY; Yan F; Hao H; Wu JX; Chen QH; Xian JF
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Mar; 128(5):586-92. PubMed ID: 25698188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI for the differentiation of benign from malignant soft-tissue tumors.
Choi YJ; Lee IS; Song YS; Kim JI; Choi KU; Song JW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Sep; 50(3):798-809. PubMed ID: 30663160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Value of 3T magnetic resonance dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging in differential diagnosis of musculoskeletal tumors].
Qi ZH; Li CF; Ma XX; Yang H; Jiang BD; Zhang K; Yu DX
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2012 Apr; 34(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 22776599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic value of combined diffusion-weighted imaging with dynamic contrast enhancement MRI in differentiating malignant from benign bone lesions.
Cao J; Xiao L; He B; Zhang G; Dong J; Wu Y; Xie H; Wang G; Lin X
Clin Radiol; 2017 Sep; 72(9):793.e1-793.e9. PubMed ID: 28545685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management.
Wang XL; De Beuckeleer LH; De Schepper AM; Van Marck E
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(6):1054-7. PubMed ID: 11419152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
