These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771756)

  • 1. The risk of false inclusion of a relative in parentage testing - an in silico population study.
    Lee JC; Tsai LC; Chu PC; Lin YY; Lin CY; Huang TY; Yu YJ; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Croat Med J; 2013 Jun; 54(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 23771756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Risk analysis of duo parentage testing with limited STR loci.
    Zhang MX; Gao HM; Han SY; Liu Y; Tian YL; Sun SH; Xiao DJ; Li CT; Wang YS
    Genet Mol Res; 2014 Feb; 13(1):1179-86. PubMed ID: 24634174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing false paternity risk in simulated motherless cases from more than 20 000 real exclusion trios.
    Aguiar VRC; de Castro AM; Pinto LM; Ferreira ACS; Dos Santos EVW; Louro ID
    Transfusion; 2021 Mar; 61(3):678-681. PubMed ID: 33084042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rapid and efficient resolution of parentage by amplification of short tandem repeats.
    Alford RL; Hammond HA; Coto I; Caskey CT
    Am J Hum Genet; 1994 Jul; 55(1):190-5. PubMed ID: 8023845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations.
    Chakraborty R; Stivers DN
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Jul; 41(4):671-7. PubMed ID: 8754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity.
    Fung WK; Chung YK; Wong DM
    Int J Legal Med; 2002 Apr; 116(2):64-7. PubMed ID: 12056522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency evaluation of common forensic genetic markers for parentage identification involving close relatives.
    Zhang XR; Meng HT; Shi JF; Wang N; Wang ZY; Zhang B; Zhu BF; Guo YX
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Apr; 345():111594. PubMed ID: 36871533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A study of paternity testing with considering mutation].
    Hou YP; Wu J; Hou JY; Yan J; Li YB; Gao S; Sun XM; Luo HB
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 24(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 17680532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mother-child double incompatibility at vWA and D5S818 loci in paternity testing.
    Narkuti V; Vellanki RN; Gandhi KP; Mangamoori LN
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(10):1288-91. PubMed ID: 17727308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two brothers' alleged paternity for a child: who is the father?
    Dogan M; Kara U; Emre R; Fung WK; Canturk KM
    Mol Biol Rep; 2015 Jun; 42(6):1025-7. PubMed ID: 25416555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multistep microsatellite mutation leading to father-child mismatch of FGA locus in a case of non-exclusion parentage.
    Jia YS; Zhang L; Qi LY; Mei K; Zhou FL; Huang DX; Yi SH
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2015 Sep; 17(5):364-5. PubMed ID: 25979606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paternity testing using microsatellite DNA markers in captive Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae).
    Sakaoka K; Suzuki I; Kasugai N; Fukumoto Y
    Zoo Biol; 2014; 33(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 25157452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of data and common mutations encountered during routine parentage testing in Zimbabwe.
    Thelingwani RS; Jonhera CA; Masimirembwa C
    Sci Rep; 2024 Jan; 14(1):1385. PubMed ID: 38228706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [A method to calculate the probability of paternity between relatives--a paternity case where the putative father was a deceased granduncle].
    Ishitani A; Minakata K; Ito N; Nagaike C; Morimura Y; Hirota T; Hatake K
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 1996 Jun; 50(3):182-9. PubMed ID: 8752991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The identification of war victims by reverse paternity is associated with significant risks of false inclusion.
    Gornik I; Marcikic M; Kubat M; Primorac D; Lauc G
    Int J Legal Med; 2002 Oct; 116(5):255-7. PubMed ID: 12376832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The probability distribution of the number of loci indicating exclusion in a core set of STR markers.
    Calafell F
    Int J Legal Med; 2000; 114(1-2):61-5. PubMed ID: 11197631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paternity probability when a relative of the father is an alleged father.
    Lee JW; Lee HS; Park M; Hwang JJ
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):223-30. PubMed ID: 10795412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An unusual case 0020 in paternity testing: nineteen autosomal short tandem repeat typing and 12 X-chromosome markers could not clarify the case.
    Tabrizi AA; Hejazi A; Hosseini M
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2013 Dec; 34(4):328-30. PubMed ID: 24196725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An incest case with three biological brothers as alleged fathers: Even 22 autosomal STR loci analysis would not suffice without the mother.
    Canturk KM; Emre R; Gurkan C; Komur I; Muslumanoglu O; Dogan M
    Med Sci Law; 2016 Jul; 56(3):210-2. PubMed ID: 26377934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.