446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23771876)
1. Video laryngoscopy is associated with increased first pass success and decreased rate of esophageal intubations during urgent endotracheal intubation in a medical intensive care unit when compared to direct laryngoscopy.
Lakticova V; Koenig SJ; Narasimhan M; Mayo PH
J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 30(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 23771876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.
Kory P; Guevarra K; Mathew JP; Hegde A; Mayo PH
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 23687228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy during urgent endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial.
Silverberg MJ; Li N; Acquah SO; Kory PD
Crit Care Med; 2015 Mar; 43(3):636-41. PubMed ID: 25479112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conventional Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Tube Exchange: Glottic Visualization, Success Rates, Complications, and Rescue Alternatives in the High-Risk Difficult Airway Patient.
Mort TC; Braffett BH
Anesth Analg; 2015 Aug; 121(2):440-8. PubMed ID: 26111264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety of Propofol as an Induction Agent for Urgent Endotracheal Intubation in the Medical Intensive Care Unit.
Koenig SJ; Lakticova V; Narasimhan M; Doelken P; Mayo PH
J Intensive Care Med; 2015 Dec; 30(8):499-504. PubMed ID: 24536033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Video laryngoscopy improves intubation success and reduces esophageal intubations compared to direct laryngoscopy in the medical intensive care unit.
Mosier JM; Whitmore SP; Bloom JW; Snyder LS; Graham LA; Carr GE; Sakles JC
Crit Care; 2013 Oct; 17(5):R237. PubMed ID: 24125064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial.
Griesdale DE; Chau A; Isac G; Ayas N; Foster D; Irwin C; Choi P;
Can J Anaesth; 2012 Nov; 59(11):1032-9. PubMed ID: 22932944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Video Laryngoscopy Improves Odds of First-Attempt Success at Intubation in the Intensive Care Unit. A Propensity-matched Analysis.
Hypes CD; Stolz U; Sakles JC; Joshi RR; Natt B; Malo J; Bloom JW; Mosier JM
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2016 Mar; 13(3):382-90. PubMed ID: 26653096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison Between Direct and Video-assisted Laryngoscopy for Intubations in a Pediatric Emergency Department.
Eisenberg MA; Green-Hopkins I; Werner H; Nagler J
Acad Emerg Med; 2016 Aug; 23(8):870-7. PubMed ID: 27208690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for double-lumen endotracheal tube intubation: a retrospective analysis.
Purugganan RV; Jackson TA; Heir JS; Wang H; Cata JP
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2012 Oct; 26(5):845-8. PubMed ID: 22361488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. EMS Intubation Improves with King Vision Video Laryngoscopy.
Jarvis JL; McClure SF; Johns D
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2015; 19(4):482-9. PubMed ID: 25909850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Learning curves for direct laryngoscopy and GlideScope® video laryngoscopy in an emergency medicine residency.
Sakles JC; Mosier J; Patanwala AE; Dicken J
West J Emerg Med; 2014 Nov; 15(7):930-7. PubMed ID: 25493156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel.
Nouruzi-Sedeh P; Schumann M; Groeben H
Anesthesiology; 2009 Jan; 110(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19104167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for orotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
De Jong A; Molinari N; Conseil M; Coisel Y; Pouzeratte Y; Belafia F; Jung B; Chanques G; Jaber S
Intensive Care Med; 2014 May; 40(5):629-39. PubMed ID: 24556912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The use of a video laryngoscope by emergency medicine residents is associated with a reduction in esophageal intubations in the emergency department.
Sakles JC; Javedani PP; Chase E; Garst-Orozco J; Guillen-Rodriguez JM; Stolz U
Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jun; 22(6):700-7. PubMed ID: 25996773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in a critical care transport service.
Guyette FX; Farrell K; Carlson JN; Callaway CW; Phrampus P
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2013; 17(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 23231426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Video laryngoscopy improves the first-attempt success in endotracheal intubation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation among novice physicians.
Park SO; Kim JW; Na JH; Lee KH; Lee KR; Hong DY; Baek KJ
Resuscitation; 2015 Apr; 89():188-94. PubMed ID: 25541427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with direct Macintosh laryngoscopy in the emergency department.
Vassiliadis J; Tzannes A; Hitos K; Brimble J; Fogg T
Emerg Med Australas; 2015 Apr; 27(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 25640845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct Versus Video Laryngoscopy for Intubating Adult Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Carlson JN; Crofts J; Walls RM; Brown CA
West J Emerg Med; 2015 Dec; 16(7):1052-6. PubMed ID: 26759653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Video laryngoscopy in pre-hospital critical care - a quality improvement study.
Rhode MG; Vandborg MP; Bladt V; Rognås L
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2016 Jun; 24():84. PubMed ID: 27297563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
