These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23772358)
1. Identification of environmentally relevant chemicals in bibliographic databases: a comparative analysis. Ellegaard O; Wallin JA Springerplus; 2013 Dec; 2(1):255. PubMed ID: 23772358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coverage of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: a case study of the h-index in nursing. De Groote SL; Raszewski R Nurs Outlook; 2012; 60(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 22748758 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Searching for information on chemical substances in selected biomedical bibliographic databases. Ludl H; Schöpe K; Mangelsdorf I Chemosphere; 1995 Jul; 31(2):2611-28. PubMed ID: 7663948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia. Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. Kulkarni AV; Aziz B; Shams I; Busse JW JAMA; 2009 Sep; 302(10):1092-6. PubMed ID: 19738094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information Retrieval in Telemedicine: a Comparative Study on Bibliographic Databases. Ahmadi M; Sarabi RE; Orak RJ; Bahaadinbeigy K Acta Inform Med; 2015 Jun; 23(3):172-6. PubMed ID: 26236086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Information Retrieval in Food Science Research II: Accounting for Relevance When Evaluating Database Performance. Urhan TK; Rempel HG; Meunier-Goddik L; Penner MH J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):2729-2735. PubMed ID: 31550403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Anker MS; Hadzibegovic S; Lena A; Haverkamp W ESC Heart Fail; 2019 Dec; 6(6):1291-1312. PubMed ID: 31886636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Growth of Global Publishing Output of Health Economics in the Twenty-First Century: A Bibliographic Insight. Jakovljevic MM; Pejcic AV Front Public Health; 2017; 5():211. PubMed ID: 28848731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Croatian Medical Journal citation score in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Sember M; Utrobicić A; Petrak J Croat Med J; 2010 Apr; 51(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 20401951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Specialist Bibliographic Databases. Gasparyan AY; Yessirkepov M; Voronov AA; Trukhachev VI; Kostyukova EI; Gerasimov AN; Kitas GD J Korean Med Sci; 2016 May; 31(5):660-73. PubMed ID: 27134485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of the performance of seven key bibliographic databases in identifying all relevant systematic reviews of interventions for hypertension. Rathbone J; Carter M; Hoffmann T; Glasziou P Syst Rev; 2016 Feb; 5():27. PubMed ID: 26862061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identifying evidence for public health guidance: a comparison of citation searching with Web of Science and Google Scholar. Levay P; Ainsworth N; Kettle R; Morgan A Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 26147600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. Falagas ME; Pitsouni EI; Malietzis GA; Pappas G FASEB J; 2008 Feb; 22(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 17884971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Citation searches are more sensitive than keyword searches to identify studies using specific measurement instruments. Linder SK; Kamath GR; Pratt GF; Saraykar SS; Volk RJ J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Apr; 68(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 25554521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: the popularization of bibliometric assessment]. Cabezas-Clavijo A; Delgado-López-Cózar E Med Intensiva; 2013; 37(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 23517697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Searching the right database. A comparison of four databases for psychiatry journals. McDonald S; Taylor L; Adams C Health Libr Rev; 1999 Sep; 16(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 10620849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Database indexing of health science journals from the German-speaking area: A journal analysis]. Hirt J; Brinkmann S; Cadima R; Dichter MN; Golla A; Kaap-Fröhlich S; Kachler M; Lauer N; Meiling C; Messer M; Paulicke D; Saal S; Schmidt S; Schwarz C; Tholen R; Ulrich G; Warnke A; Abraham J Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2020 Apr; 150-152():20-28. PubMed ID: 32439423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Searching for information on toxicological data of chemical substances in selected bibliographic databases--selection of essential databases for toxicological researches. Ludl H; Schöpe LH; Mangelsdorf I Chemosphere; 1996 Mar; 32(5):867-80. PubMed ID: 8867141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]