These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23772839)

  • 1. Accuracy of working length measurement: electronic apex locator versus cone-beam computed tomography.
    Lucena C; López JM; Martín JA; Robles V; González-Rodríguez MP
    Int Endod J; 2014 Mar; 47(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 23772839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: Dentaport ZX, Raypex 5 and ProPex II.
    Somma F; Castagnola R; Lajolo C; Paternò Holtzman L; Marigo L
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jun; 45(6):552-6. PubMed ID: 22257341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ex vivo comparison of two electronic apex locators with different scales and frequencies.
    Hör D; Krusy S; Attin T
    Int Endod J; 2005 Dec; 38(12):855-9. PubMed ID: 16343110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Micro-computed Tomographic Evaluation of the Accuracy of 3 Electronic Apex Locators in Curved Canals of Mandibular Molars.
    Piasecki L; José Dos Reis P; Jussiani EI; Andrello AC
    J Endod; 2018 Dec; 44(12):1872-1877. PubMed ID: 30390968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of a new apex locator: an in vitro study.
    Kaufman AY; Keila S; Yoshpe M
    Int Endod J; 2002 Feb; 35(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 11843975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Use of Micro-Computed Tomography to Determine the Accuracy of 2 Electronic Apex Locators and Anatomic Variations Affecting Their Precision.
    Piasecki L; Carneiro E; da Silva Neto UX; Westphalen VP; Brandão CG; Gambarini G; Azim AA
    J Endod; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1263-7. PubMed ID: 27291503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of working length determination with radiographs and four electronic apex locators.
    Vieyra JP; Acosta J
    Int Endod J; 2011 Jun; 44(6):510-8. PubMed ID: 21306402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Raypex 5 and the Mini Apex Locator: an in vivo study.
    Stöber EK; de Ribot J; Mercadé M; Vera J; Bueno R; Roig M; Duran-Sindreu F
    J Endod; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1349-52. PubMed ID: 21924180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard.
    Liang YH; Jiang L; Chen C; Gao XJ; Wesselink PR; Wu MK; Shemesh H
    J Endod; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1607-10. PubMed ID: 24238457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An in vivo comparison of working length determination by only root-ZX apex locator versus combining root-ZX apex locator with radiographs using a new impression technique.
    Kim E; Marmo M; Lee CY; Oh NS; Kim IK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e79-83. PubMed ID: 18329572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ex vivo comparison of working length determination by 3 electronic apex locators.
    Pascon EA; Marrelli M; Congi O; Ciancio R; Miceli F; Versiani MA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Sep; 108(3):e147-51. PubMed ID: 19716484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.
    Venturi M; Breschi L
    Int Endod J; 2007 May; 40(5):362-73. PubMed ID: 17309741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans in comparison with periapical radiographs for root canal length measurement: an in situ study.
    Metska ME; Liem VM; Parsa A; Koolstra JH; Wesselink PR; Ozok AR
    J Endod; 2014 Aug; 40(8):1206-9. PubMed ID: 25069934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparing the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and electronic apex locator for root canal length determination in primary teeth.
    Ghule KD; Naik S
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2019; 37(2):157-161. PubMed ID: 31249179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Endodontic length measurements using 3D Endo, cone-beam computed tomography, and electronic apex locator.
    Van Pham K
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):271. PubMed ID: 34006262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Brigante L; Lesti B; Somma F
    Int Endod J; 2006 May; 39(5):408-14. PubMed ID: 16640641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Four Electronic Apex Locators in Detecting Working Length: An Ex Vivo Study.
    Yolagiden M; Ersahan S; Suyun G; Bilgec E; Aydin C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1427-1433. PubMed ID: 30713168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator in primary teeth with root resorption.
    Angwaravong O; Panitvisai P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Feb; 42(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 19134039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination.
    Kqiku L; Städtler P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Endodontic Working Length Measurement Using Cone-beam Computed Tomographic Images Obtained at Different Voxel Sizes and Field of Views, Periapical Radiography, and Apex Locator: A Comparative Ex Vivo Study.
    Yılmaz F; Kamburoğlu K; Şenel B
    J Endod; 2017 Jan; 43(1):152-156. PubMed ID: 27986097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.