These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2377289)
21. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition? White MJ Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words. Sasanuma S; Itoh M; Mori K; Kobayashi Y Neuropsychologia; 1977; 15(4-5):547-53. PubMed ID: 896010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Hemispheric interactions: the bilateral advantage and task difficulty. Norman WD; Jeeves MA; Milne A; Ludwig T Cortex; 1992 Dec; 28(4):623-42. PubMed ID: 1478088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A new approach to cerebral asymmetry: RT differences in simultaneous bimanual finger movement during verbal and nonverbal tasks. Wünscher T; Jordan K; Gille HG; Roth N Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 2342853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Semantic capabilities of the left and right cerebral hemispheres in categorization tasks: effects of verbal-pictorial presentation. Nieto A; Hernández S; Gonzalez-Feria L; Barroso J Neuropsychologia; 1990; 28(11):1175-86. PubMed ID: 2290492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Inferring patterns of hemispheric specialization for individual subjects from laterality data: a two-task criterion. Kim H; Levine SC Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(1):93-105. PubMed ID: 2017309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Further fMRI validation of the visual half field technique as an indicator of language laterality: a large-group analysis. Van der Haegen L; Cai Q; Seurinck R; Brysbaert M Neuropsychologia; 2011 Aug; 49(10):2879-88. PubMed ID: 21708178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of script direction on word processing modes in left and right visual fields. Siéroff E; Slama Y Laterality; 2018 Jul; 23(4):479-500. PubMed ID: 29141494 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Opposite hemispheric activations as a result of emotionally threatening and non-threatening words. Van Strien JW; Morpurgo M Neuropsychologia; 1992 Sep; 30(9):845-8. PubMed ID: 1407498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mixed-list presentation and visual field asymmetry: attempts to differentially activate the hemispheres. Richards A; Beaumont JG Behav Brain Res; 1988 Sep; 30(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 3166712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Presentation of a new tachistoscopic test procedure for measuring functional hemisphere asymmetries of the optic field]. Spiel G; Kral G; Kundi M Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 1985 May; 53(5):154-67. PubMed ID: 4018701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Left dominance for language perception starts in the extrastriate cortex: An ERP and sLORETA study. Selpien H; Siebert C; Genc E; Beste C; Faustmann PM; Güntürkün O; Ocklenburg S Behav Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 291():325-333. PubMed ID: 26048428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Test-retest reliability of standard and emotional stroop tasks: an investigation of color-word and picture-word versions. Strauss GP; Allen DN; Jorgensen ML; Cramer SL Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 16123253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]