These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23773159)

  • 1. Set-fit effects in choice.
    Evers ER; Inbar Y; Zeelenberg M
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):504-9. PubMed ID: 23773159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Seeing sets: representation by statistical properties.
    Ariely D
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 11340926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Centrality preferences in choices among similar options.
    Shaw JI; Bergen JE; Brown CA; Gallagher ME
    J Gen Psychol; 2000 Apr; 127(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10843258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The evil of banality: When choosing between the mundane feels like choosing between the worst.
    Shenhav A; Dean Wolf CK; Karmarkar UR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2018 Dec; 147(12):1892-1904. PubMed ID: 29771566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantity judgments of sequentially presented food items by capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).
    Evans TA; Beran MJ; Harris EH; Rice DF
    Anim Cogn; 2009 Jan; 12(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 18670794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Eliciting patients' preferences for epilepsy diagnostics: a discrete choice experiment.
    Wijnen BF; de Kinderen RJ; Colon AJ; Dirksen CD; Essers BA; Hiligsmann M; Leijten FS; Ossenblok PP; Evers SM
    Epilepsy Behav; 2014 Feb; 31():102-9. PubMed ID: 24389020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When knowledge is demotivating: subjective knowledge and choice overload.
    Hadar L; Sood S
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Sep; 25(9):1739-47. PubMed ID: 25037963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Infants use different mechanisms to make small and large number ordinal judgments.
    vanMarle K
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Jan; 114(1):102-10. PubMed ID: 22608189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do framing effects reveal irrational choice?
    Mandel DR
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Jun; 143(3):1185-98. PubMed ID: 23978186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supportive social relationships attenuate the appeal of choice.
    Ybarra O; Lee DS; Gonzalez R
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1186-92. PubMed ID: 22915083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring the loss of consumer choice in mandatory health programmes using discrete choice experiments.
    Parkinson B; Goodall S; Norman R
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Apr; 11(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 23494935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences.
    Hawkins GE; Marley AA; Heathcote A; Flynn TN; Louviere JJ; Brown SD
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):701-35. PubMed ID: 24124986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How choice affects and reflects preferences: revisiting the free-choice paradigm.
    Chen MK; Risen JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Oct; 99(4):573-94. PubMed ID: 20658837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The limits of endowment effects in great apes (Pan paniscus, Pan troglodytes, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo pygmaeus).
    Kanngiesser P; Santos LR; Hood BM; Call J
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 Nov; 125(4):436-45. PubMed ID: 21767009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The importance of usability in product choice: a mobile phone case study.
    Mack Z; Sharples S
    Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1514-28. PubMed ID: 19941184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biased predecisional processing of leading and nonleading alternatives.
    Blanchard SJ; Carlson KA; Meloy MG
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 25(3):812-6. PubMed ID: 24403397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Categorization processes in mental comparisons.
    Cech CG; Shoben EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 May; 27(3):800-16. PubMed ID: 11394681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why the parts are better (or worse) than the whole: the unique-attributes hypothesis.
    Chambers JR
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):268-75. PubMed ID: 20424056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Thinking in categories or along a continuum: consequences for children's social judgments.
    Master A; Markman EM; Dweck CS
    Child Dev; 2012; 83(4):1145-63. PubMed ID: 22540868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. First is best.
    Carney DR; Banaji MR
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e35088. PubMed ID: 22761650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.