BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23773188)

  • 21. Comparison of somatic mutation calling methods in amplicon and whole exome sequence data.
    Xu H; DiCarlo J; Satya RV; Peng Q; Wang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2014 Mar; 15():244. PubMed ID: 24678773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. One Size Doesn't Fit All - RefEditor: Building Personalized Diploid Reference Genome to Improve Read Mapping and Genotype Calling in Next Generation Sequencing Studies.
    Yuan S; Johnston HR; Zhang G; Li Y; Hu YJ; Qin ZS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Aug; 11(8):e1004448. PubMed ID: 26267278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparative study of single nucleotide variant detection performance using three massively parallel sequencing methods.
    Trudsø LC; Andersen JD; Jacobsen SB; Christiansen SL; Congost-Teixidor C; Kampmann ML; Morling N
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239850. PubMed ID: 32986766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimating genotype error rates from high-coverage next-generation sequence data.
    Wall JD; Tang LF; Zerbe B; Kvale MN; Kwok PY; Schaefer C; Risch N
    Genome Res; 2014 Nov; 24(11):1734-9. PubMed ID: 25304867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Somatic Single-Nucleotide Variant Calling from Single-Cell DNA Sequencing Data Using SCAN-SNV.
    Bahonar S; Montazeri H
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2493():267-277. PubMed ID: 35751821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reference genotype and exome data from an Australian Aboriginal population for health-based research.
    Tang D; Anderson D; Francis RW; Syn G; Jamieson SE; Lassmann T; Blackwell JM
    Sci Data; 2016 Apr; 3():160023. PubMed ID: 27070114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. In-depth comparison of somatic point mutation callers based on different tumor next-generation sequencing depth data.
    Cai L; Yuan W; Zhang Z; He L; Chou KC
    Sci Rep; 2016 Nov; 6():36540. PubMed ID: 27874022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comprehensive comparison of three commercial human whole-exome capture platforms.
    Asan ; Xu Y; Jiang H; Tyler-Smith C; Xue Y; Jiang T; Wang J; Wu M; Liu X; Tian G; Wang J; Wang J; Yang H; Zhang X
    Genome Biol; 2011 Sep; 12(9):R95. PubMed ID: 21955857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. SECEDO: SNV-based subclone detection using ultra-low coverage single-cell DNA sequencing.
    Rozhoňová H; Danciu D; Stark S; Rätsch G; Kahles A; Lehmann KV
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(18):4293-4300. PubMed ID: 35900151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. GeDi: applying suffix arrays to increase the repertoire of detectable SNVs in tumour genomes.
    Coleman I; Corleone G; Arram J; Ng HC; Magnani L; Luk W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Feb; 21(1):45. PubMed ID: 32024475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
    Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Massively parallel sequencing of the mouse exome to accurately identify rare, induced mutations: an immediate source for thousands of new mouse models.
    Andrews TD; Whittle B; Field MA; Balakishnan B; Zhang Y; Shao Y; Cho V; Kirk M; Singh M; Xia Y; Hager J; Winslade S; Sjollema G; Beutler B; Enders A; Goodnow CC
    Open Biol; 2012 May; 2(5):120061. PubMed ID: 22724066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Use of Non-Variant Sites to Improve the Clinical Assessment of Whole-Genome Sequence Data.
    Ferrarini A; Xumerle L; Griggio F; Garonzi M; Cantaloni C; Centomo C; Vargas SM; Descombes P; Marquis J; Collino S; Franceschi C; Garagnani P; Salisbury BA; Harvey JM; Delledonne M
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132180. PubMed ID: 26147798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nucleotide polymorphism and copy number variant detection using exome capture and next-generation sequencing in the polyploid grass Panicum virgatum.
    Evans J; Kim J; Childs KL; Vaillancourt B; Crisovan E; Nandety A; Gerhardt DJ; Richmond TA; Jeddeloh JA; Kaeppler SM; Casler MD; Buell CR
    Plant J; 2014 Sep; 79(6):993-1008. PubMed ID: 24947485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Targeted Sequencing Reveals Large-Scale Sequence Polymorphism in Maize Candidate Genes for Biomass Production and Composition.
    Muraya MM; Schmutzer T; Ulpinnis C; Scholz U; Altmann T
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132120. PubMed ID: 26151830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of Exome and Genome Sequencing Technologies for the Complete Capture of Protein-Coding Regions.
    Lelieveld SH; Spielmann M; Mundlos S; Veltman JA; Gilissen C
    Hum Mutat; 2015 Aug; 36(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 25973577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Genotype Calling from Population-Genomic Sequencing Data.
    Maruki T; Lynch M
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 May; 7(5):1393-1404. PubMed ID: 28108551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Sensitivity to sequencing depth in single-cell cancer genomics.
    Alves JM; Posada D
    Genome Med; 2018 Apr; 10(1):29. PubMed ID: 29661213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Confounded by sequencing depth in association studies of rare alleles.
    Garner C
    Genet Epidemiol; 2011 May; 35(4):261-8. PubMed ID: 21328616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.