136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23773342)
1. The influence of working memory capacity on experimental heat pain.
Nakae A; Endo K; Adachi T; Ikeda T; Hagihira S; Mashimo T; Osaka M
J Pain; 2013 Oct; 14(10):1088-96. PubMed ID: 23773342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The neural basis of executive function in working memory: an fMRI study based on individual differences.
Osaka N; Osaka M; Kondo H; Morishita M; Fukuyama H; Shibasaki H
Neuroimage; 2004 Feb; 21(2):623-31. PubMed ID: 14980565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Shielding cognition from nociception with working memory.
Legrain V; Crombez G; Plaghki L; Mouraux A
Cortex; 2013; 49(7):1922-34. PubMed ID: 23026759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Picture span test: measuring visual working memory capacity involved in remembering and comprehension.
Tanabe A; Osaka N
Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):309-17. PubMed ID: 19363171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Event-related potential correlates of individual differences in working memory capacity.
Nittono H; Nageishi Y; Nakajima Y; Ullsperger P
Psychophysiology; 1999 Nov; 36(6):745-54. PubMed ID: 10554588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Individual differences in working memory capacity in recency effects: from the recall process.
Sasaki T
Psychol Rep; 2009 Apr; 104(2):545-8. PubMed ID: 19610484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of response prepotency strength, general working memory resources, and specific working memory load on the ability to inhibit predominant responses: a comparison of young and elderly participants.
Grandjean J; Collette F
Brain Cogn; 2011 Nov; 77(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 21885178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Age and individual differences in working memory: the size judgment span task.
Cherry KE; Elliott EM; Reese CM
J Gen Psychol; 2007 Jan; 134(1):43-65. PubMed ID: 17283854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The development of a short domain-general measure of working memory capacity.
Oswald FL; McAbee ST; Redick TS; Hambrick DZ
Behav Res Methods; 2015 Dec; 47(4):1343-1355. PubMed ID: 25479734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Working through the pain: working memory capacity and differences in processing and storage under pain.
Sanchez CA
Memory; 2011 Feb; 19(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 21331971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working memory capacity and retrieval limitations from long-term memory: an examination of differences in accessibility.
Unsworth N; Spillers GJ; Brewer GA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(12):2397-410. PubMed ID: 22800472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The nature of age-related decline on the reading span task.
Meguro Y; Fujii T; Yamadori A; Tsukiura T; Suzuki K; Okuda J; Osaka M
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Jun; 22(3):391-8. PubMed ID: 10855046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The composite complex span: French validation of a short working memory task.
Gonthier C; Thomassin N; Roulin JL
Behav Res Methods; 2016 Mar; 48(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25669761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a force production task and a working memory task on pain perception.
Paris TA; Misra G; Archer DB; Coombes SA
J Pain; 2013 Nov; 14(11):1492-501. PubMed ID: 24055565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disruption of attention and working memory traces in individuals with chronic pain.
Dick BD; Rashiq S
Anesth Analg; 2007 May; 104(5):1223-9, tables of contents. PubMed ID: 17456678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cognitive aging and inhibitory efficiency in the Daneman and Carpenter's working memory task.
Schelstraete MA; Hupet M
Exp Aging Res; 2002; 28(3):269-79. PubMed ID: 12079578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Individual differences in working memory capacity predict sleep-dependent memory consolidation.
Fenn KM; Hambrick DZ
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 Aug; 141(3):404-10. PubMed ID: 21910555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
