BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23773680)

  • 1. A pilot study evaluating shaved cavity margins with micro-computed tomography: a novel method for predicting lumpectomy margin status intraoperatively.
    Tang R; Coopey SB; Buckley JM; Aftreth OP; Fernandez LJ; Brachtel EF; Michaelson JS; Gadd MA; Specht MC; Koerner FC; Smith BL
    Breast J; 2013; 19(5):485-9. PubMed ID: 23773680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Micro-computed tomography (Micro-CT): a novel approach for intraoperative breast cancer specimen imaging.
    Tang R; Buckley JM; Fernandez L; Coopey S; Aftreth O; Michaelson J; Saksena M; Lei L; Specht M; Gadd M; Yagi Y; Rafferty E; Brachtel E; Smith BL
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Jun; 139(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 23670129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) for intraoperative surgical margin assessment of breast cancer: A feasibility study in breast conserving surgery.
    Qiu SQ; Dorrius MD; de Jongh SJ; Jansen L; de Vries J; Schröder CP; Zhang GJ; de Vries EGE; van der Vegt B; van Dam GM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1708-1713. PubMed ID: 30005963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lumpectomy specimen margins are not reliable in predicting residual disease in breast conserving surgery.
    Tang R; Coopey SB; Specht MC; Lei L; Gadd MA; Hughes KS; Brachtel EF; Smith BL
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jul; 210(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 25613784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Should New "No Ink On Tumor" Lumpectomy Margin Guidelines be Applied to Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS)? A Retrospective Review Using Shaved Cavity Margins.
    Merrill AL; Tang R; Plichta JK; Rai U; Coopey SB; McEvoy MP; Hughes KS; Specht MC; Gadd MA; Smith BL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Oct; 23(11):3453-3458. PubMed ID: 27207096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Micro-computed tomography enables rapid surgical margin assessment during breast conserving surgery (BCS): correlation of whole BCS micro-CT readings to final histopathology.
    McClatchy DM; Zuurbier RA; Wells WA; Paulsen KD; Pogue BW
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Dec; 172(3):587-595. PubMed ID: 30225621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
    Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
    Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intraoperative micro-computed tomography (micro-CT): a novel method for determination of primary tumour dimensions in breast cancer specimens.
    Tang R; Saksena M; Coopey SB; Fernandez L; Buckley JM; Lei L; Aftreth O; Koerner F; Michaelson J; Rafferty E; Brachtel E; Smith BL
    Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150581. PubMed ID: 26568439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Breast-Conserving Surgery Margin Guidance Using Micro-Computed Tomography: Challenges When Imaging Radiodense Resection Specimens.
    Streeter SS; Zuurbier RA; diFlorio-Alexander RM; Hansberry MT; Maloney BW; Pogue BW; Wells WA; Paulsen KD; Barth RJ
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 30(7):4097-4108. PubMed ID: 37041429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Feasibility of Micro-Computed Tomography Imaging for Direct Assessment of Surgical Resection Margins During Breast-Conserving Surgery.
    Janssen NNY; van Seijen M; Loo CE; Vrancken Peeters MTFD; Hankel T; Sonke JJ; Nijkamp J
    J Surg Res; 2019 Sep; 241():160-169. PubMed ID: 31026794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term results of phase II ablation after breast lumpectomy added to extend intraoperative margins (ABLATE l) trial.
    Klimberg VS; Ochoa D; Henry-Tillman R; Hardee M; Boneti C; Adkins LL; McCarthy M; Tummel E; Lee J; Malak S; Makhoul I; Korourian S
    J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Apr; 218(4):741-9. PubMed ID: 24655863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
    Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
    Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of MarginProbe as an adjunct to standard operating procedure does not significantly reduce re-excision rates in breast conserving surgery.
    LeeVan E; Ho BT; Seto S; Shen J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):145-151. PubMed ID: 32607640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Imaging of lumpectomy surface with large field-of-view confocal laser scanning microscopy 'Histolog® scanner' for breast margin assessment in comparison with conventional specimen radiography.
    Togawa R; Hederer J; Ragazzi M; Bruckner T; Fastner S; Gomez C; Hennigs A; Nees J; Pfob A; Riedel F; Schäfgen B; Stieber A; Lux MP; Heil J; Golatta M
    Breast; 2023 Apr; 68():194-200. PubMed ID: 36842192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
    Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of Micro-CT in imaging breast cancer specimens.
    DiCorpo D; Tiwari A; Tang R; Griffin M; Aftreth O; Bautista P; Hughes K; Gershenfeld N; Michaelson J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Apr; 180(2):343-357. PubMed ID: 32020431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: does the method matter?
    Wright MJ; Park J; Fey JV; Park A; O'Neill A; Tan LK; Borgen PI; Cody HS; Van Zee KJ; King TA
    J Am Coll Surg; 2007 Apr; 204(4):541-9. PubMed ID: 17382212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can micro-computed tomography imaging improve interpretation of macroscopic margin assessment of specimen radiography in excised breast specimens?
    Abel TN; Bourke AG
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(6):1366-1370. PubMed ID: 33342798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.